The exchange that got the reporter booted wasn’t even a question to Trump.
> **Vaughn Hillyard** (asking Elise Stefanik.): “Do you believe E. Jean Carroll?”
>
> **Elise Stefanik**: “No, of course not… The media is so biased. This is just another example of the media being out of touch.”
>
> **Vaughn Hillyard**: “It’s not the media, it’s a jury that found he sexually abused E. Jean Carroll.”
Trump campaign doesn’t like it when the rapist Donald Trump is reminded that he’s a rapist
_Flaired users only_
Donald „The rapist“ Trump doesn’t like being called a rapist? Huh. Go figure.
I really would prefer if “probing” and “Trump” could be kept out of the same sentence.
Weak.
Little coward Trump
Of course I know who the President is, I know very strongly, and everyone says I know who it is, I have tremendous knowledge of who the Senators are, and it’s very, very bad, and disgusting, and sick of you to ask that question, so you’re out, you’re done, and you won’t be covering 2026 either, I’ll tell you that right now, but of course I know who the Supreme Court is, believe me.
The campaign is *protecting* Stefanik because she will be the VP nominee and they’re afraid to lose the female vote ….
Such a fucking baby. I don’t know how anyone can look at this guy I think “alpha male.”
They are simply prep’ing their cult followers to disregard jury trials’ integrity for Trump’s upcoming trials. That’s a big ask..
As someone who has had jury duty five times, including a six month stint on grand jury and jury foreman on a murder trial, that ask is kind of the last straw of cognitive dissonance believability stunts.. It’s a very big jump, especially for anyone who has actually been on a jury panel – and that’s probably most folks in Trump’s world, they are older, etc. They actually know how it works.
In my personal experience (yours may differ), no matter who is on a jury, once that jury room door closes, folks park their stupid, get ultra serious, almost miraculously shut off their biases (no matter how crazy) and make very careful, rational decisions together based on the evidence and law. It is actually quite an extremely humbling, reassuring experience to witness.. Then, the moment they are dismissed, they go back to their old prejudices..
If they manage to discredit our jury-based system and MAGA folks buy it, then that will be a new rock bottom..
The real life version of r/conservative
So like, does anyone think that OJ didn’t murder Nicole? Because that would be the equivalent of saying that Trump’s not a rapist.
Snowflake in chief
At this point, asking him to count to five qualifies as a probing question.
A little preview of a trump dementia administration
17 comments
So, they chickened out?
The exchange that got the reporter booted wasn’t even a question to Trump.
> **Vaughn Hillyard** (asking Elise Stefanik.): “Do you believe E. Jean Carroll?”
>
> **Elise Stefanik**: “No, of course not… The media is so biased. This is just another example of the media being out of touch.”
>
> **Vaughn Hillyard**: “It’s not the media, it’s a jury that found he sexually abused E. Jean Carroll.”
Trump campaign doesn’t like it when the rapist Donald Trump is reminded that he’s a rapist
_Flaired users only_
Donald „The rapist“ Trump doesn’t like being called a rapist? Huh. Go figure.
I really would prefer if “probing” and “Trump” could be kept out of the same sentence.
Weak.
Little coward Trump
Of course I know who the President is, I know very strongly, and everyone says I know who it is, I have tremendous knowledge of who the Senators are, and it’s very, very bad, and disgusting, and sick of you to ask that question, so you’re out, you’re done, and you won’t be covering 2026 either, I’ll tell you that right now, but of course I know who the Supreme Court is, believe me.
The campaign is *protecting* Stefanik because she will be the VP nominee and they’re afraid to lose the female vote ….
Such a fucking baby. I don’t know how anyone can look at this guy I think “alpha male.”
They are simply prep’ing their cult followers to disregard jury trials’ integrity for Trump’s upcoming trials. That’s a big ask..
As someone who has had jury duty five times, including a six month stint on grand jury and jury foreman on a murder trial, that ask is kind of the last straw of cognitive dissonance believability stunts.. It’s a very big jump, especially for anyone who has actually been on a jury panel – and that’s probably most folks in Trump’s world, they are older, etc. They actually know how it works.
In my personal experience (yours may differ), no matter who is on a jury, once that jury room door closes, folks park their stupid, get ultra serious, almost miraculously shut off their biases (no matter how crazy) and make very careful, rational decisions together based on the evidence and law. It is actually quite an extremely humbling, reassuring experience to witness.. Then, the moment they are dismissed, they go back to their old prejudices..
If they manage to discredit our jury-based system and MAGA folks buy it, then that will be a new rock bottom..
The real life version of r/conservative
So like, does anyone think that OJ didn’t murder Nicole? Because that would be the equivalent of saying that Trump’s not a rapist.
Snowflake in chief
At this point, asking him to count to five qualifies as a probing question.
A little preview of a trump dementia administration