The stuck in Ukraine, and will lose the war soon or later, their technology is not comparable to west, plus they run off to have so money to even get some Chinese craps.
Unless NATO disappears and Western Europe and Poland collapse, I don’t see that happening anytime soon. Not to mention manpower and equipment loss they suffered (and still suffer) in Ukraine.
And morons won’t listen to Eastern EU countries again. West is suspectable to hybrid warfare, and lots of things can change in a decade.
Is there any strategic point to opening another disconnected front?
The NATO thing notwithstanding
Maybe Putin on his death bed launches all out war in a fever dream,ya never know.
Chances for that happening are same as mine to be president of USA.
Don’t worry dear Lithuanians you and your country will still witness next 100 years, us (Serbia) wiping basketball court with your national team.
Euope is already lost….10 to 20 years there will be no europe…..we are full of people who will not fight cause they are imigrantes, other half is lgbtqrepdbwhdjsbdkdj+ crybabies, you think those islam migrants will fight for us.?? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 We all saw in ukraine how migrants fled like flies
Proud Goebbels like this Propaganda
Nothing to do for ruzzia in Baltics. Unless US will ask ruzzia to invade. But Europe is buying lots of military equipment from US so no reason to scare Europe more….
Even if we ignore NATO and how impossible such a war is for Russia, do they even have the motif?
Yeah! Every nation may attack every other nation. Or may not do so.
it will be Moldova.
Lol who writes this c&@p first they say russia is weak its gonna crumble in few weeks . Then its so strong that it will attack NATO on full scale war and take Germany or whole Europe .
Im guessing here what is the motivation of this article may be like Nikki Heyley to push arms sales and create more panic and fear so all countries spend more $$$$ like back in cold war?
Ukraine needs to propagate the idea that all of Europe is next, of course. But reality is that now that NATO troops are deployed in Finland, Ukraine and Belarus will be the only countries were Russia will be able to deploy troops without starting WW3. Russian expansion in Europe will stop after the Ukraine war (no matter how it ends). The only way it would be able to continue is if all guarantees of mutual defense in place by NATO fall down and countries like the Baltics stop being protected by 3 nuclear powers.
This politicians are trying to gaslight us with project fear.
Yeah, that’s not gonna happen.
Are the actually people who believe this?
again?
Personally, I am almost sure that it will happen eventually. Just don’t know whether that’s going to happen in early 2025 or later.
The reason – the groundwork on the Russian side has already started.
1)Re-establishment of Leningrad military district.
2)(Russian) society believing that Baltics are non-sovereign and belong to Russia. Heavy propaganda work there as well – Balts dislike them because of wars, self-entitlement (like Americans, but oftentimes way worse) and refusal to learn/speak the languages and they hate us because we have a negative opinion about them and because we see their minorities as a threat to national security (it’s like “how dare they to dislike us, I am not pro-Putin”), which leads to even higher level of hostility than with Ukraine where the saga of Nazis and Ukrainian snipers bombing Donetsk kids was created.
3)Insane money pumped into RU military (Russian weapons are cheap af in comparison to the western ones).
4)Trump and MAGA republicans (I guess Russians are sponsoring them to talk that bullshit).
5)War fatigue in Ukraine and a desire for a peace deal no matter the conditions from the UA side (can’t blame them).
There are some indications from our side as well (Lithuania specifically):
1) Very, very strange remarks from our foreign minister a month ago.
2) Emergency mining of the border.
3) Conscription reform – would be shortened to 6 months (regular) or 3 months (engineers/doctors) from the next year.
People forget (or never even find out) that Article 5 **DOES NOT** say: *When a member state is invaded, all partners in the alliance are immediately at war with the aggressor.*
It’s surprisingly weak. It says, that if a member is attacked, others shall *take such action, as they deem necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area*. It doesn’t even explicitly guarantee providing support until full territorial integrity is restored! It says: *Such measures shall be terminated when the Security Council has taken the measures necessary to restore and maintain international peace and security.*
It looks like in theory, if Ukraine already was in NATO, and was still invaded exactly like in reality, and the West responded exactly like it really did, that response wouldn’t qualify as breach of the treaty! After all, they *took action, as they deemed necessary*. And if the war ends with Ukraine loosing territory, they still could have said that *international peace and security is restored* so these *measures* (military help) *shall be terminated*.
What’s up with the “after” talk? It’s more likely that “after”, Russia will back off with the tail between their legs.
Then Lithuania should finally walk the talk.
Lithuania is the __only__ ocuntry that refuses to send their PzH 2000 artillery to Ukraine. Even evil Germany has already sent some of theirs to Ukraine to make sure there is no ‘_after Ukraine_’ for Russia. I don’t think Lithuania has sent a single tank, Patriot system, long range missile or jet either. All things that countries like the US, Poland, France, UK, etc have done at least one of.
Small countries want attention.
Russia has neither interest or needs to invade the baltics
Hitluania is spewing shit again, says I
In the way the Russians see it, this is a battle for their “survival” not only as a nation but ethnicity, they feel like they need to protect all the different gaps an invasion can come from, Ukraine is not even in one of these gaps, but in the route to 2 of these
26 comments
[removed]
The stuck in Ukraine, and will lose the war soon or later, their technology is not comparable to west, plus they run off to have so money to even get some Chinese craps.
Unless NATO disappears and Western Europe and Poland collapse, I don’t see that happening anytime soon. Not to mention manpower and equipment loss they suffered (and still suffer) in Ukraine.
And morons won’t listen to Eastern EU countries again. West is suspectable to hybrid warfare, and lots of things can change in a decade.
Is there any strategic point to opening another disconnected front?
The NATO thing notwithstanding
Maybe Putin on his death bed launches all out war in a fever dream,ya never know.
Chances for that happening are same as mine to be president of USA.
Don’t worry dear Lithuanians you and your country will still witness next 100 years, us (Serbia) wiping basketball court with your national team.
Euope is already lost….10 to 20 years there will be no europe…..we are full of people who will not fight cause they are imigrantes, other half is lgbtqrepdbwhdjsbdkdj+ crybabies, you think those islam migrants will fight for us.?? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 We all saw in ukraine how migrants fled like flies
Proud Goebbels like this Propaganda
Nothing to do for ruzzia in Baltics. Unless US will ask ruzzia to invade. But Europe is buying lots of military equipment from US so no reason to scare Europe more….
Even if we ignore NATO and how impossible such a war is for Russia, do they even have the motif?
Yeah! Every nation may attack every other nation. Or may not do so.
it will be Moldova.
Lol who writes this c&@p first they say russia is weak its gonna crumble in few weeks . Then its so strong that it will attack NATO on full scale war and take Germany or whole Europe .
Im guessing here what is the motivation of this article may be like Nikki Heyley to push arms sales and create more panic and fear so all countries spend more $$$$ like back in cold war?
Ukraine needs to propagate the idea that all of Europe is next, of course. But reality is that now that NATO troops are deployed in Finland, Ukraine and Belarus will be the only countries were Russia will be able to deploy troops without starting WW3. Russian expansion in Europe will stop after the Ukraine war (no matter how it ends). The only way it would be able to continue is if all guarantees of mutual defense in place by NATO fall down and countries like the Baltics stop being protected by 3 nuclear powers.
This politicians are trying to gaslight us with project fear.
Yeah, that’s not gonna happen.
Are the actually people who believe this?
again?
Personally, I am almost sure that it will happen eventually. Just don’t know whether that’s going to happen in early 2025 or later.
The reason – the groundwork on the Russian side has already started.
1)Re-establishment of Leningrad military district.
2)(Russian) society believing that Baltics are non-sovereign and belong to Russia. Heavy propaganda work there as well – Balts dislike them because of wars, self-entitlement (like Americans, but oftentimes way worse) and refusal to learn/speak the languages and they hate us because we have a negative opinion about them and because we see their minorities as a threat to national security (it’s like “how dare they to dislike us, I am not pro-Putin”), which leads to even higher level of hostility than with Ukraine where the saga of Nazis and Ukrainian snipers bombing Donetsk kids was created.
3)Insane money pumped into RU military (Russian weapons are cheap af in comparison to the western ones).
4)Trump and MAGA republicans (I guess Russians are sponsoring them to talk that bullshit).
5)War fatigue in Ukraine and a desire for a peace deal no matter the conditions from the UA side (can’t blame them).
There are some indications from our side as well (Lithuania specifically):
1) Very, very strange remarks from our foreign minister a month ago.
2) Emergency mining of the border.
3) Conscription reform – would be shortened to 6 months (regular) or 3 months (engineers/doctors) from the next year.
People forget (or never even find out) that Article 5 **DOES NOT** say: *When a member state is invaded, all partners in the alliance are immediately at war with the aggressor.*
It’s surprisingly weak. It says, that if a member is attacked, others shall *take such action, as they deem necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area*. It doesn’t even explicitly guarantee providing support until full territorial integrity is restored! It says: *Such measures shall be terminated when the Security Council has taken the measures necessary to restore and maintain international peace and security.*
It looks like in theory, if Ukraine already was in NATO, and was still invaded exactly like in reality, and the West responded exactly like it really did, that response wouldn’t qualify as breach of the treaty! After all, they *took action, as they deemed necessary*. And if the war ends with Ukraine loosing territory, they still could have said that *international peace and security is restored* so these *measures* (military help) *shall be terminated*.
What’s up with the “after” talk? It’s more likely that “after”, Russia will back off with the tail between their legs.
Then Lithuania should finally walk the talk.
Lithuania is the __only__ ocuntry that refuses to send their PzH 2000 artillery to Ukraine. Even evil Germany has already sent some of theirs to Ukraine to make sure there is no ‘_after Ukraine_’ for Russia. I don’t think Lithuania has sent a single tank, Patriot system, long range missile or jet either. All things that countries like the US, Poland, France, UK, etc have done at least one of.
Small countries want attention.
Russia has neither interest or needs to invade the baltics
Hitluania is spewing shit again, says I
In the way the Russians see it, this is a battle for their “survival” not only as a nation but ethnicity, they feel like they need to protect all the different gaps an invasion can come from, Ukraine is not even in one of these gaps, but in the route to 2 of these