Bericht warnt: Russland strebt nach militärischen Verlusten in der Ukraine nukleare Abschreckung an

by 4920185

27 comments
  1. It’s a real risk but it’s also fear mongering.

  2. The US already issued a warning to Russia during the first few months. If Russia used Nuclear weapons in Ukraine, the Wests response would be nothing less than catastrophic for Russia.

  3. This is news? As if Russia hasn’t been spasmodically threatening nuclear war since day 1.

  4. Freaking Russia, always screeching about nukes. You can tell NATO is the big swinging dick in the room because they know they don’t have to say a word about nukes or how tough they are.

  5. Putin is like a 6-year-old with this whole ‘if I can’t have it no one can’ attitude only killing his own people & country

  6. >“Morally, this is a terrible choice as we will use God’s weapon, thus dooming ourselves to grave spiritual losses. But if we do not do this, not only Russia can die, but most likely the entire human civilization will cease to exist. By breaking the West’s will to continue the aggression, we will not only save ourselves and finally free the world from the five-century-long Western yoke, but we will also save humanity,” Karaganov wrote

    Dude’s gone off the deep end

  7. russians are a bunch of cowards, they won’t do shit. Fuck moscovy.

  8. Come on Russia show us the monster you are and then die in your own nuclear shit for all eternity from the world

  9. Just another reason NATO should accept Ukraine into its ranks.

  10. Putin wants to ”rage quit”because he’s a baby. Imagine if these pathetic people end humanity. What a damn joke this whole existence would have been.

  11. Joke’s on you Russia, aliens won’t let you use nukes because it screws with their ship’s TVs.

  12. “Fucking do it already then, you cowards!”

    The only way to beat Russian crazy, is to go absolute bat shit American crazy.

  13. This is just some idea hashed up by some dude sitting in a room in Moscow who isn’t part of the Russian govt.

  14. Given the track record of their shitty weapons in Ukraine, they can’t be sure that their nukes even work. And the only thing worse than launching a nuke is launching a nuke that doesn’t work. Your country will be obliterated and you don’t even get a benefit.

  15. I know its a frieghtenimg prospect but with Russia its hard to believe everything they say or even threaten with, and whos to say they will be succesful with this threat, what if they launch these missiles and devices only for their engineering to fail them again.

  16. Why not? The MAGA politicians have opened the door to showing the US will flinch and back down if it serves them politically.

  17. Deterrent?

    A deterrent would be used if Russia wanted to prevent a country from attacking Russia. This isn’t a deterrent this is just an attack option.

  18. I feel like I’ve heard this one already. I would have thought they had new material by now.

  19. Orrrrrrr…..maybe just live your fucking sad lives in peace, trying to make a just and prosperous society? Maybe, try that instead of exporting murder, mayhem and misery around the globe for the lolz of black hearted ghoul gangsters?

  20. Never heard of VOA News but their opening paragraph tells me it’s clickbait.

    > Russia’s heavy losses in its full-scale invasion of Ukraine mean that Moscow now sees its battlefield nuclear weapons as increasingly important in deterring and defeating NATO, according to a new report from the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), which warns that the West must wake up to the rising nuclear threat.

    Russia isn’t even fighting NATO.

  21. When they keep talking about nuclear stuff, it indicates they want to negotiate, but they think they can get a deal without giving back all the lands they stole and declare a victor back home. They hope.

Leave a Reply