Nobel laureate Paul Krugman says this isn’t a ‘Goldilocks’ economy – it’s even better, thanks to strong growth and cooling inflation

4 comments

1. But food is too expensive and homes and rates are too expensive and boomers are responsible somehow ; /

2. Krugman is a propagandist dolt.

3. Again when you read these headlines, if you add (the missing part) .. “…for the top 10-20% of Americans with paid off homes and fat stock portfolios”, it reads better and makes more sense

4. And I can’t imagine things being worse. This has 1929 written all over it, but we have the added factor of rampant government debt, spending, and a budget deficit.

   This is why economics is pseudo science. A hair more reliable than astrology.