No doubt iran supplied all the parts, but somewhere in russia someone’s been stealing stuff before they’re fully assembled.
Fix’’em up and send them back from where they came.
The problem of scale. It’s comparatively easy to build something at low rate production and maintain quality but the ability to scale that up and produce something at the rate needed by, what is essentially a munition, is an order of magnitude harder and has always been Russias problem, even during Soviet times.
They probably feel le tired.
Could be quality problems, could be jamming, could be operator error.
Isn’t this the kind of information that should be kept top secret?
When Ukraine finds a way to exploit a weakness in an enemy’s weapons system, we shouldn’t be reading about the details of the exploit.
I just watched a video by combat vet reacts and he mentioned Britain had sent more anti drone equipment and that the Ukrainians were using them to great effect.
>”Ukraine has a modern development and not a single one that can interfere into controlling such systems through electronic influence (EW),” said Oleksandr Fedienko.
That translation is whack. He didn’t say, “not a single one”, he said
> (і не одну)
Word by word, I can understand someone thinking it means “and not one”, but it’s actually an idiom that means “more than one” or “not merely one”.
The way they translated it made it sound like he was denying they had any, but he actually said that they had a lot.
8 comments
Must be one of the new *Made in russia* variety.
No doubt iran supplied all the parts, but somewhere in russia someone’s been stealing stuff before they’re fully assembled.
Fix’’em up and send them back from where they came.
The problem of scale. It’s comparatively easy to build something at low rate production and maintain quality but the ability to scale that up and produce something at the rate needed by, what is essentially a munition, is an order of magnitude harder and has always been Russias problem, even during Soviet times.
They probably feel le tired.
Could be quality problems, could be jamming, could be operator error.
Isn’t this the kind of information that should be kept top secret?
When Ukraine finds a way to exploit a weakness in an enemy’s weapons system, we shouldn’t be reading about the details of the exploit.
I just watched a video by combat vet reacts and he mentioned Britain had sent more anti drone equipment and that the Ukrainians were using them to great effect.
>”Ukraine has a modern development and not a single one that can interfere into controlling such systems through electronic influence (EW),” said Oleksandr Fedienko.
That translation is whack. He didn’t say, “not a single one”, he said
> (і не одну)
Word by word, I can understand someone thinking it means “and not one”, but it’s actually an idiom that means “more than one” or “not merely one”.
The way they translated it made it sound like he was denying they had any, but he actually said that they had a lot.