Nothing accidental about it. It’s all part of a wider campaign of demoralisation in this nightmarish anarcho-tyranny.
Once again asylum policy is failing and it’s consquences are killing our citizens.
Of course.
Everyone is welcome, come on over. Your rent is free and you can wonder around as you see fit.
[deleted]
The road to hell is paved with good intentions. What’s going on in this country? Under the last labour gov, the one that wanted to rub our noses in diversity, deportations were running at 50k annually, now it’s barely 3k. Now even whispering the deportation word gets one smeared as a far right bigot. There’s sex offender acid attackers running loose, convicted rapists that can’t be deported for fear of them being persecuted for being rapists, conversions en mass to christianity being rubber stamped by dogooder preists that need to replace their dying congregations… this country has descended into maddness no longer able or willing to protect its citizens. And they’re surprised that no one wants to fight for this divided ‘diversity is our strength’ riddled dump.
Are they deliberately trying to forment hatred of immigrants?
I’m all for granting asylum to genuine claimants. I believe in upholding human rights. But anyone who commits a violent crime such as this should automatically be exempt. This just fuels the far-right and populist sentiment. If we don’t get a handle on it, we are in danger of heading down a very dark road as people become increasingly frustrated.
“Reading Killer” is understating who this guy is, he’s a terrorist who killed three innocent people in a park, and a member of a Salafist Islamist group aligned with Al Qaida:
He was granted leave to remain despite being caught lying in his asylum claim that he hadn’t fought in Libya (the police actually found photos of him with weapons), and after this:
> He had spent years in and out of prison for a **range of violent offences, including: multiple assaults on police officers and emergency workers, racially aggravated harassment, possessing knives, and causing suffering to animals**
> While in jail in 2017, he was noted by the prison authorities to be spending significant time with the notorious Islamist radicaliser Omar Brooks, also known as Abu Izzadeen, a long-time member of the now outlawed group al-Muhajiroun.
> Early last year, he successfully applied to the court of appeal to reduce a prison sentence, meaning he was eventually released eight months earlier than expected.
> He had been twice refused asylum but, following a judicial review in 2018, was granted leave to remain for five years.
> A fellow inmate, Anthony Bloomfield, says that, in the months before he was released, **Saadallah: openly threatened knife violence, discussed “jihad”, said he wanted to “rape Britain”, said “if he could get away with it, he’d kill as many people as possible” and
“He’d be the front line for when it comes to drawing a sword and drawing blood and attacking people”**
Despite all of that:
> “the day before his release in June, two weeks before the attack, he was told in a letter that **the home secretary had “decided that your deportation is conducive to the public good” but it was not legally possible given conditions in Libya.”**
This is fairly clear cut case for what it means to give the current human rights legislation a veto over deportation cases. We literally cannot deport an Al Qaeda member to a country which is dangerous because of Al Qaeda.
Used to love this country…. Oh well. Just take it and shut up. You can’t say anything. Let’s just watch the football and forget about it
How many people criticizing the government’s asylum policies would be in favour of the UK pulling out of the European human rights treaty and the UN Charter on refugees?
10 comments
Nothing accidental about it. It’s all part of a wider campaign of demoralisation in this nightmarish anarcho-tyranny.
Once again asylum policy is failing and it’s consquences are killing our citizens.
Of course.
Everyone is welcome, come on over. Your rent is free and you can wonder around as you see fit.
[deleted]
The road to hell is paved with good intentions. What’s going on in this country? Under the last labour gov, the one that wanted to rub our noses in diversity, deportations were running at 50k annually, now it’s barely 3k. Now even whispering the deportation word gets one smeared as a far right bigot. There’s sex offender acid attackers running loose, convicted rapists that can’t be deported for fear of them being persecuted for being rapists, conversions en mass to christianity being rubber stamped by dogooder preists that need to replace their dying congregations… this country has descended into maddness no longer able or willing to protect its citizens. And they’re surprised that no one wants to fight for this divided ‘diversity is our strength’ riddled dump.
Are they deliberately trying to forment hatred of immigrants?
I’m all for granting asylum to genuine claimants. I believe in upholding human rights. But anyone who commits a violent crime such as this should automatically be exempt. This just fuels the far-right and populist sentiment. If we don’t get a handle on it, we are in danger of heading down a very dark road as people become increasingly frustrated.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/01/30/net-migration-uk-population-over-70-million-2026-ons/
“Reading Killer” is understating who this guy is, he’s a terrorist who killed three innocent people in a park, and a member of a Salafist Islamist group aligned with Al Qaida:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_Reading_stabbings
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-55582126
He was granted leave to remain despite being caught lying in his asylum claim that he hadn’t fought in Libya (the police actually found photos of him with weapons), and after this:
> He had spent years in and out of prison for a **range of violent offences, including: multiple assaults on police officers and emergency workers, racially aggravated harassment, possessing knives, and causing suffering to animals**
> While in jail in 2017, he was noted by the prison authorities to be spending significant time with the notorious Islamist radicaliser Omar Brooks, also known as Abu Izzadeen, a long-time member of the now outlawed group al-Muhajiroun.
> Early last year, he successfully applied to the court of appeal to reduce a prison sentence, meaning he was eventually released eight months earlier than expected.
> He had been twice refused asylum but, following a judicial review in 2018, was granted leave to remain for five years.
> A fellow inmate, Anthony Bloomfield, says that, in the months before he was released, **Saadallah: openly threatened knife violence, discussed “jihad”, said he wanted to “rape Britain”, said “if he could get away with it, he’d kill as many people as possible” and
“He’d be the front line for when it comes to drawing a sword and drawing blood and attacking people”**
Despite all of that:
> “the day before his release in June, two weeks before the attack, he was told in a letter that **the home secretary had “decided that your deportation is conducive to the public good” but it was not legally possible given conditions in Libya.”**
This is fairly clear cut case for what it means to give the current human rights legislation a veto over deportation cases. We literally cannot deport an Al Qaeda member to a country which is dangerous because of Al Qaeda.
Used to love this country…. Oh well. Just take it and shut up. You can’t say anything. Let’s just watch the football and forget about it
How many people criticizing the government’s asylum policies would be in favour of the UK pulling out of the European human rights treaty and the UN Charter on refugees?