Biden Blasts Special Counsel Suggesting He Forgot Son’s Death: ‘How in the Hell Dare He’ | “When I was asked the question, I thought to myself it wasn’t any of their damn business,” the president said in remarks Thursday

by newfrontier58

19 comments

  1. Biden does every thing for the country .. a real patriot, the other to avoid prison and continue the grift. It’s those who don’t see that, that are the problem ..

    Navarro has to appeal from prison .. maybe he’s the long awaited domino .. check in will be delicious ..

  2. I’d just take the no charges win and walk away, there’s important work yet to be done.

  4. Poor Joe, only he can mention his dead son and lie about the cause of his death.

  5. The gaffe will blow over. It will give the right wing media ammo for a month, but once Trump’s criminal trials start especially the Manhattan one on March 25th, all their energy will be going to protecting Trump and attack the judge and Alvin Bragg

  6. Why was the Special Counsel even asking about such a thing?

  7. Biden should Fire Merrick Garland and the P.O.S special prosecutor who politicized a “no crimes found” investigation

  8. Interesting how the bias in the report is identified in DoJ comments itself in the report. Clearly there is bias by Hur.

    “The President’s inability to recall dates or details of events that happened years ago is neither surprising nor unusual, especially given that many questions asked him to recall the particulars of staff work to pack. ship, and store materials and furniture in the course of moves between residences. The same predictable memory loss occurred with other witnesses in this investigation. Yet unlike your treatment of President Biden, your report accepts other witnesses’ memory loss as completely understandable given the passage of time. For example. you accepted without denigrating John McGrail’s failure to remember certain events while he served as then-Vice President Biden’s counsel: ”McGrail’s memory of these events could well have faded over the course of more than 6 years.” Report at 238 n.923; see also id at 67. 69 noting Mr. McGrail’s failure to recall events despite emails that place him in the center of various discussions). So, too, you accept the memory lapse of one of the President’s personal lawyers who testified that in his initial search of the Penn Biden offices certain boxes were stored in a locked closet, noting only that “his memory was fuzzy on that point.” Id at 265. And the events on which you found the lawyer’s memory to be ‘·fuzzy” occurred only a few months before his interview. Id; see also id at 64, 66 (noting without comment the failures of recollection by numerous staffers).

    Your treatment of President Biden stands in marked contrast to the lack of pejorative comments about other individuals. It is also in contrast to your own description of the President’s responses on other subjects as ‘·clear forceful testimony” that would be “compelling” to a jury. Id. at 233. Not only do you treat the President differently from other witnesses when discussing his limited recall of certain years-ago events. but you also do so on occasions in prejudicial and inflammatory terms. You refer to President Biden’s memory on at least nine occasions-a number that is itself gratuitous. But. even among those nine instances, your report varies. It is one thing to observe President Biden’s memory as being “significantly limited” on certain subjects. Id. at 5. It is quite another to use the more sweeping and highly prejudicial language employed later in the report. This language is not supported by the facts, nor is it appropriately used by a federal prosecutor in this context.

    We request that you revisit your descriptions of President Biden’s memory and revise them so that they are stated in a manner that is within the bounds of your expertise and remit.”

    https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf

  9. We are the crazies and you are scared to death of us and we embrace it! 😵

  10. The “special counsel” is just another unprofessional magat hack.

  11. There was something very odd about this Special Prosecutor.

  12. >I thought to myself it wasn’t any of their damn business,” the president said in remarks Thursday

    Don’t keep classified documents from your time as VP stored carelessly in an unsecured area, Mr. President, and you never have to worry about answering a special counsel again.

    PS, your guy appointed special counsel Hur. Maybe direct your questions toward AG Garland?

  13. They’re going to destroy the world’s most powerful nation for Donald J. Trump!

  15. There is no way they keep Biden on the ticket. If they do, the debates will be the greatest embarrassment of this great country other than electing this corpse in the first place.

  16. When will the DEMS learn. Long past time to take the gloves off. GOP appointed special counsel plays politics with report and the DEMS are pearl clutching. It’s not 1977. Stop expecting decorum, and fairness. Stop “when they go low, we go high”. That attitude has gotten a 6-3 CON JOB on the SCOTUS and half of America believing a Presidential election was stolen. Gavin Newsome is the only person who seems to understand this.

  18. I teared up so badly when he spoke about that. Incredibly cruel. Then all those reporters YELLING questions about his age jfc

Leave a Reply