“Knowing the Ukro-Nazis had a kill limit I sent wave after wave of my own tanks at them until they reached the limit and shut down” – Putin Probably
And dont get it twisted they will sadly eventually capture it just like they did bakhmut unless we provide more assistance
It’s really just a logistics problem, they’re probably parked in the woods where their shit faced crews left them after running out of fuel. The rest got destroyed.
You have to wonder if Trump is in contact with Putin. Saying what he does about Russia being able to do what they want and his party holding back funding I’d have to say this is orchestrated.
Its sad AF Trump has got his party to delay support for Ukraine so he can use it as a political tool in any election. The guy is a 100% traitor to his country 🙁
Reading the headline I was thinking, “Man, that’s not good for Russia, but losing 10% of the tanks sent on an offensive is a pretty good loss rate for them in this war…oh shit they lost 10% of their total pool?!”
…so far
-Homer Simpson
Not without cost to Ukraine and the big difference is…..Russia doesn’t care
Super skeptical of these percentages. We’ve heard that Russia is out of this, low on that, has run out of the other since…well since it started bombing Syria tbh. Unfortunately Russia somehow keeps pulling more kit out and the analysts go on to make the next prediction.
They do look to be capturing the city though so they are making positive progress whilst Ukraine hasn’t made any land gains in months.
The number of deployed tanks lost doesn’t really matter when you’ve thousands of undeployed ones in yards across the country.
It kind of worries me that Zelensky switched out commanders from one that values tactical retreats to one that it more determined to hold even when losses are bad. That’s basically what this article is talking about. It probably depends on how hard it would be to retake the position, would they lose more holding it or retaking it? I hope our representatives get their asses in gear and help out with supplying Ukraine with more of what they need soon.
18 comments
Don’t worry, next up are some T-34’s followed by Tsar Tanks, and finally muzzle loaded muskets.
… and 200% of its preinvasion troops.
And their crews ….. tanks, they have enough (old stuff). But experienced crews are getting fewer and fewer.
Should start seeing their mounted cavalry soon
By the looks of the current situation, they’re taking it…
Avdievka is a wolf trap for orcs tanks 🖕☠️🖕
Literally decimated
[https://www.etymonline.com/word/decimate](https://www.etymonline.com/word/decimate)
“Knowing the Ukro-Nazis had a kill limit I sent wave after wave of my own tanks at them until they reached the limit and shut down” – Putin Probably
And dont get it twisted they will sadly eventually capture it just like they did bakhmut unless we provide more assistance
It’s really just a logistics problem, they’re probably parked in the woods where their shit faced crews left them after running out of fuel. The rest got destroyed.
You have to wonder if Trump is in contact with Putin. Saying what he does about Russia being able to do what they want and his party holding back funding I’d have to say this is orchestrated.
Its sad AF Trump has got his party to delay support for Ukraine so he can use it as a political tool in any election. The guy is a 100% traitor to his country 🙁
Reading the headline I was thinking, “Man, that’s not good for Russia, but losing 10% of the tanks sent on an offensive is a pretty good loss rate for them in this war…oh shit they lost 10% of their total pool?!”
…so far
-Homer Simpson
Not without cost to Ukraine and the big difference is…..Russia doesn’t care
Super skeptical of these percentages. We’ve heard that Russia is out of this, low on that, has run out of the other since…well since it started bombing Syria tbh. Unfortunately Russia somehow keeps pulling more kit out and the analysts go on to make the next prediction.
They do look to be capturing the city though so they are making positive progress whilst Ukraine hasn’t made any land gains in months.
The number of deployed tanks lost doesn’t really matter when you’ve thousands of undeployed ones in yards across the country.
It kind of worries me that Zelensky switched out commanders from one that values tactical retreats to one that it more determined to hold even when losses are bad. That’s basically what this article is talking about. It probably depends on how hard it would be to retake the position, would they lose more holding it or retaking it? I hope our representatives get their asses in gear and help out with supplying Ukraine with more of what they need soon.
Blown apart by relatively cheap toy drones. lol