Well the enemy supplies lines are not in Ukraine so this makes sense.
Perhaps if Belgorod were razed to to the ground much like so many Ukraine cities the Russian people would realize there is consequences to the actions of their government.
But notice he’s not pushing to give Ukraine the munitions necessary to do so.
That needs to be said?
Ukraine always needs permission but Russia can do whatever they like
Its absurd that North Korea and Iran can give missiles and drones to Russia for them to use against Ukraine, but is seen in western capitals as an “escalation” for Western countries to do the exact same thing and let Ukraine use western weapons against Russian military infrastructure within Russia.
Logical. If Russia can obtain weapons from a 3rd country and use them outside of it’s own borders, then why couldn’t Ukraine do the same ?
The whole “oh no we might start WW3” escalation seems rather moot now that Russia has opened the door to this ‘equivelent’ use of 3rd party weapons for Ukraine.
If Moscow launches Iranian and NK weapons into Ukraine, then Kyiv can lanch US and EU weapons into Russia. Seems ‘equivelent’ to me.
We still shouldn’t negotiate with Russian terrorists. They’re too stupid to understand the point of it, anyway.
LET’S GO!
This whole argument about striking Russia directly has been ridiculous, forcing Ukraine to fight with one hand tied behind its back. The US and western allies should be ashamed. What if it was YOUR country being raized to the ground and reduced to rubble, civilians deliberately slaughtered wholesale?
Mmm. In my opinion, this should include polish farmers on border routes, and knife-wielding hooligans on german streets. Russian targets.
I would start striking every oil refinery.
Ukraine will stop striking targets outside Ukraine when Russia stops striking targets outside Russia.
Holy paywall! Crikey.
NATO chief ( also known as Dick Tracy)
For fucks sake. Russia has claimed they are free to use nukes if they face an “existential threat”. This is the extent of the Ukrainian crisis now.
Majority of Russians air attacks come from within their boarder. Also, since Russia has just routing everything through other countries, their economy needs to be hit.
It’s like telling a boxer “you can only punch the other guy in the gloves he’s punching you with, not his face even though he’s punching you in the face.”
I mean thanks NATO, but if I get punched in the face I’m not waiting for permission.
And they should.
Of course they do. They were attacked and invaded.
But not with NATO weapons, because that’s escalation right?
24 comments
Well the enemy supplies lines are not in Ukraine so this makes sense.
Perhaps if Belgorod were razed to to the ground much like so many Ukraine cities the Russian people would realize there is consequences to the actions of their government.
But notice he’s not pushing to give Ukraine the munitions necessary to do so.
That needs to be said?
Ukraine always needs permission but Russia can do whatever they like
Its absurd that North Korea and Iran can give missiles and drones to Russia for them to use against Ukraine, but is seen in western capitals as an “escalation” for Western countries to do the exact same thing and let Ukraine use western weapons against Russian military infrastructure within Russia.
Logical. If Russia can obtain weapons from a 3rd country and use them outside of it’s own borders, then why couldn’t Ukraine do the same ?
The whole “oh no we might start WW3” escalation seems rather moot now that Russia has opened the door to this ‘equivelent’ use of 3rd party weapons for Ukraine.
If Moscow launches Iranian and NK weapons into Ukraine, then Kyiv can lanch US and EU weapons into Russia. Seems ‘equivelent’ to me.
We still shouldn’t negotiate with Russian terrorists. They’re too stupid to understand the point of it, anyway.
LET’S GO!
This whole argument about striking Russia directly has been ridiculous, forcing Ukraine to fight with one hand tied behind its back. The US and western allies should be ashamed. What if it was YOUR country being raized to the ground and reduced to rubble, civilians deliberately slaughtered wholesale?
Mmm. In my opinion, this should include polish farmers on border routes, and knife-wielding hooligans on german streets. Russian targets.
I would start striking every oil refinery.
Ukraine will stop striking targets outside Ukraine when Russia stops striking targets outside Russia.
Holy paywall! Crikey.
NATO chief ( also known as Dick Tracy)
For fucks sake. Russia has claimed they are free to use nukes if they face an “existential threat”. This is the extent of the Ukrainian crisis now.
Majority of Russians air attacks come from within their boarder. Also, since Russia has just routing everything through other countries, their economy needs to be hit.
It’s like telling a boxer “you can only punch the other guy in the gloves he’s punching you with, not his face even though he’s punching you in the face.”
I mean thanks NATO, but if I get punched in the face I’m not waiting for permission.
And they should.
Of course they do. They were attacked and invaded.
But not with NATO weapons, because that’s escalation right?
Of course it has, why not?
Finally.
Its the only way to stop Russia.