Harboring? Yeah, in the same way my house is harboring bricks….
Harbouring? They’re an explicitly extremist party – increasingly so over the past decade. It’s pretty much their whole raison d’etre. Their former leader had an entire public history of saying the most grotesquely racist things, which his mates in the media deliberately ignored so they could camp out on Corbyn’s doorstep for five years instead. They’re literally BluUKIP at this point.
I would ask if Starmer had heard of the Rwanda policy, but he’s on record as saying Labour would not only deport more people to Rwanda, they’d do it more efficiently as well. Rachel Reeves has said Labour will be tougher on immigrants and people using benefits than the Tories have been.
A cynical person might say the whole point of the Tories pushing further and further to the right allows Labour to also move further and further to the right, while still maintain a position as “the sensible centrist party.” Thus, the Overton window gets deliberately shifted rightwards and Labour get to become the continuity Conservative Party (while still giving us plebs the illusion of democratic choice.)
Both parties have quite a range of “extremists” in them…
It is like this country has been a melting pot of people from multiple regions around the world who believe in vastly different things and have vastly different cultural ideals resulting in “extremist” ideas. It is clear to I think most people (maybe not the mob) that this sort of mixing on a grand scale like this does not work for the wider society.
In the wake of recent events. The importing of foreign conflicts does look like the beginning of an all-out war between certain groups/cultures in the near future that this country will be dragged into.
Is it time we asked, has this experiment in multiculturalism been worth it?
And before anyone screams “phobia” as I am not praising the obvious success of multiculturalism in this country. My comment is an observation of how multiple cultures don’t seem to work together no matter how much you wish they do. Does not matter where people are from or what their skin colour is. Mixing belief systems and cultures that are totally opposed to each other causes this to happen and results in extremist ideology.
The definition of an extremist depends very much on who is calling them an extremist.
Just give me a political party that will sort out the problem of potholes on the roads, make sure the bins are collected on time and food and housing is affordable. If a party just focuses on that then they’ll win. Doesn’t matter if it’s left or right wing, we should care about the things that affects our population rather than some battle thousands of miles away
Starmer is himself a weak man obsessed with appearing strong
7 comments
https://www.declassifieduk.org/labour-mps-have-accepted-over-280000-from-israel-lobby/
Pot calling the kettle black.
Harboring? Yeah, in the same way my house is harboring bricks….
Harbouring? They’re an explicitly extremist party – increasingly so over the past decade. It’s pretty much their whole raison d’etre. Their former leader had an entire public history of saying the most grotesquely racist things, which his mates in the media deliberately ignored so they could camp out on Corbyn’s doorstep for five years instead. They’re literally BluUKIP at this point.
I would ask if Starmer had heard of the Rwanda policy, but he’s on record as saying Labour would not only deport more people to Rwanda, they’d do it more efficiently as well. Rachel Reeves has said Labour will be tougher on immigrants and people using benefits than the Tories have been.
A cynical person might say the whole point of the Tories pushing further and further to the right allows Labour to also move further and further to the right, while still maintain a position as “the sensible centrist party.” Thus, the Overton window gets deliberately shifted rightwards and Labour get to become the continuity Conservative Party (while still giving us plebs the illusion of democratic choice.)
Both parties have quite a range of “extremists” in them…
It is like this country has been a melting pot of people from multiple regions around the world who believe in vastly different things and have vastly different cultural ideals resulting in “extremist” ideas. It is clear to I think most people (maybe not the mob) that this sort of mixing on a grand scale like this does not work for the wider society.
In the wake of recent events. The importing of foreign conflicts does look like the beginning of an all-out war between certain groups/cultures in the near future that this country will be dragged into.
Is it time we asked, has this experiment in multiculturalism been worth it?
And before anyone screams “phobia” as I am not praising the obvious success of multiculturalism in this country. My comment is an observation of how multiple cultures don’t seem to work together no matter how much you wish they do. Does not matter where people are from or what their skin colour is. Mixing belief systems and cultures that are totally opposed to each other causes this to happen and results in extremist ideology.
The definition of an extremist depends very much on who is calling them an extremist.
Just give me a political party that will sort out the problem of potholes on the roads, make sure the bins are collected on time and food and housing is affordable. If a party just focuses on that then they’ll win. Doesn’t matter if it’s left or right wing, we should care about the things that affects our population rather than some battle thousands of miles away
Starmer is himself a weak man obsessed with appearing strong