Near the end of each year, the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) publishes a report on the emissions gap, which is the widening gap between global emissions and where we need to be, and each year global warming accelerates.

We are really playing a fools game.

Report: “Emissions Gap Report 2023
Broken Record
Temperatures hit new highs, yet world fails to cut emissions (again)”

Key Messages from Report

1. Global GHG emissions set new record of 57.4 GtCO2e in 2022

2. Current and historical emissions are highly unequally distributed within and among countries, reflecting global patterns of inequality

3. There has been negligible movement on NDCs (Nationally Determined Contributions) since COP 27, but some progress in NDCs and policies since the Paris Agreement was adopted

4. The number of net-zero pledges continues to increase, but confidence in their implementation remains low

5. The emissions gap in 2030 remains high: current unconditional NDCs imply a 14 GtCO2e gap for a 2°C goal and a 22 GtCO2e gap for the 1.5°C goal. The additional implementation of the conditional NDCs reduces these estimates by 3 GtCO2e

6. Action in this decade will determine the ambition required in the next round of NDCs for 2035, and the feasibility of achieving the long-term temperature goal of the Paris Agreement

7. If current policies are continued, global warming is estimated to be limited to 3°C. Delivering on all unconditional and conditional pledges by 2030 lowers this estimate to 2.5°C, with the additional fulfilment of all net-zero pledges bringing it to 2°C

8. The failure to stringently reduce emissions in high-income countries and to prevent further emissions growth in low- and middle-income countries implies that all countries must urgently accelerate economy-wide, low-carbon transformations to achieve the long-term temperature goal of the Paris Agreement

9. Low- and middle-income countries face substantial economic and institutional challenges in low-carbon energy transitions, but can also exploit opportunities

10. Further delay of stringent global GHG emissions reductions will increase future reliance on CDR (Carbon Dioxide Removal) to meet the long-term temperature goal of the Paris Agreement

In a nutshell, this UN report documents the gap between emissions and what is needed to slow, let alone halt accelerated global warming from the United Nations perspective. I am bringing it to your attention, but as you and I both know, things are much worse than depicted, and worsening at an accelerating rate.

The UN has slowly realized that we need to remove carbon from the atmosphere and the oceans (CDR). What they do not yet realize is that we also need to utilize large scale Solar Radiation Management (SRM) to cool the planet, but I am guessing they will eventually come to this point of view, hopefully sooner rather than later

Please donate to http://PaulBeckwith.net to support my research and videos as I join the dots on abrupt climate system mayhem.



by paulhenrybeckwith

4 comments
  1. Paul, thanks for all your videos and updates !

    re : Peak Heat and SRM

    > The UN has slowly realized that we need to remove carbon from the atmosphere and the oceans (CDR). What they do not yet realize is that we also need to utilize large scale Solar Radiation Management (SRM) to cool the planet, but I am guessing they will eventually come to this point of view, hopefully sooner rather than later

    in a nutshell .. we might not be at peak carbon emissions .. but its likely to be a long flat plateau even if we are.
    That means much more TOTAL CO2, which means more heat : probably going from +1.4C now to +1.7C in 10 yrs +2.0C in 20 years ballpark.

    That heat doesn’t go away, unless we remove CO2 or reflect sunshine aka SRM.
    SRM is our most effective affordable option at scale, using either Sulphur particulates or salt water mist to increase cloud cover over the oceans where absorption is high.

    Given the extreme urgency, why aren’t we having a global emergency conference with the best scientists, engineers, biologists, bean counters to figure out most economic and effective method for SRM ?

  2. NB: Beckworth here, and Hansen, are saying essentially were already at +1.5C .. and may be at +2C within 15 years.

    Yet, these UN reports still discussing a +1.5C “scenario” …

    Quite bizarre to take a 10-year moving average when the graph is a steady slope upwards, at maximum rate of emissions, and we hit +1.5 for a few months last year.

  3. This report seems to show CDR / Carbon Dioxide Removal might potentially be able to remove 8GT of CO2 per year … yet we are currently pumping out 20GT per year of the stuff.

  4. But we’ve been assured, assured I tell you, by the most esteemed authorities that emissions are not rising!

    Were we being lied to?! /s

Leave a Reply