Of course not. They want the freedom to criminalise anyone they don’t agree with.
Probably all categorised under “woke anti levelling up extremists”
> It is precisely because we have seen, sadly, in the last six months or so, this rise in extremist ideas which is making people – other citizens in our country – feel deeply uncomfortable
Oh, so that makes it alright to call anyone that disagrees with our politicians an extremist because we wouldn’t want people to feel uncomfortable.
Will it include The 1922 Committee?
If anyone who makes “some citizens of our society feel uncomfortable” is an extremist, then if someone makes extremists feel uncomfortable, are they also an extremist?
When she speaks we all become a little more stupid
We have to make sure to miss the ones which lobby us
They’re holding off saying the quiet part out loud. For now.
>^^^anyone ^^^we ^^^don’t ^^^like
One of her fellow Tory MPs (and recent very brief Prime Minister) recently appeared on a stage with Steve Bannon, wanted him praise Tommy Robinson and told him that he needed to come and sort Britain out.
Does she mean people like Liz Truss? There’s no sensible definition of extremism which wouldn’t include her.
But she doesn’t mean Liz Truss, does she? She means brown people.
They need to be careful they don’t inadvertently categorise themselves as extremists
The fact that they even have to try and write legislation like this is a failure of integration. Cultural norms don’t need to be defined in law when everyone agrees with them. This kind of stuff simply marks the descent from a high trust society into a low trust society.
If you disagree with it then you’re on the list.
Anyone who wants an election probably
This is what happens when you think wooing out of touch boomers with stupid outdated ideologies will get you votes.
Bunch of money obsessed racists with a weird concept of getting a job will fix everything.
Could I suggest Truss’s Popular Conservatism Group is added and in equal fairness Momentum?
They’re not making specific laws to protect anyone, they’re making vague laws to ban whatever they fancy.
Marvellous, what caused the country to vote overwhelmingly for the party that is scared of the monster under the stairs and has altered the law to criminalise their imaginary enemies? The country was never perfect but it was literally great enough to live in, not had billions of public money embezzled in front of everyone and still the people that broke Britain are still taking money from us when our wages have been purposefully kept in stagnation as public services are being decimated. Enough of you reading this either voted Tory or Brexit and you have to admit your failure as well as responsibility for it.
They will name the transgenders as extremist who rape children and babies from afar with telekinesis…. and all the bigots will just agree. 😩
Could have left the post title with just the first two words.
All of this suggests the groups are going to include groups like, say, environmental groups.
Conservative Party UKIP, Reform. Bang that lot of nutters up for 13 years while the country gets sorted out.
99% certain it will continue to criminalize working class white people.
Meanwhile ignoring the cause of 99% of our terrorist deaths because of a “fear of being called racist”
Absolute wankers honestly
Soon-to-be-proscribed terror groups:
– Coalition of Chaos
– Anti-Growth Coalition
– Tofu-Eating Wokerati
– North London Metropolitan Elite
Top of the “Extremism” list should be the UK Government and all their propaganda media outlets that pushed the big fat lie of “Weapons of Mass Destruction” and pushing for war (RE: Murder of innocents in a far away land).
I am still pissed off at this, after all these years – and still, after all these years, the government and the propaganda media outlets are still pushing for wars and the murder of innocents in far away lands.
One might thik that there was a law drafted to strike a tough stance, but without a plan of action to back it up. Which would be both sloppy and dangerous, if true.
28 comments
Anyone who doesn’t vote for the Tories, duh.
Should be the Heritage Foundation.
Of course not. They want the freedom to criminalise anyone they don’t agree with.
Probably all categorised under “woke anti levelling up extremists”
> It is precisely because we have seen, sadly, in the last six months or so, this rise in extremist ideas which is making people – other citizens in our country – feel deeply uncomfortable
Oh, so that makes it alright to call anyone that disagrees with our politicians an extremist because we wouldn’t want people to feel uncomfortable.
Will it include The 1922 Committee?
If anyone who makes “some citizens of our society feel uncomfortable” is an extremist, then if someone makes extremists feel uncomfortable, are they also an extremist?
When she speaks we all become a little more stupid
We have to make sure to miss the ones which lobby us
They’re holding off saying the quiet part out loud. For now.
>^^^anyone ^^^we ^^^don’t ^^^like
One of her fellow Tory MPs (and recent very brief Prime Minister) recently appeared on a stage with Steve Bannon, wanted him praise Tommy Robinson and told him that he needed to come and sort Britain out.
Does she mean people like Liz Truss? There’s no sensible definition of extremism which wouldn’t include her.
But she doesn’t mean Liz Truss, does she? She means brown people.
They need to be careful they don’t inadvertently categorise themselves as extremists
The fact that they even have to try and write legislation like this is a failure of integration. Cultural norms don’t need to be defined in law when everyone agrees with them. This kind of stuff simply marks the descent from a high trust society into a low trust society.
If you disagree with it then you’re on the list.
Anyone who wants an election probably
This is what happens when you think wooing out of touch boomers with stupid outdated ideologies will get you votes.
Bunch of money obsessed racists with a weird concept of getting a job will fix everything.
Could I suggest Truss’s Popular Conservatism Group is added and in equal fairness Momentum?
They’re not making specific laws to protect anyone, they’re making vague laws to ban whatever they fancy.
Marvellous, what caused the country to vote overwhelmingly for the party that is scared of the monster under the stairs and has altered the law to criminalise their imaginary enemies? The country was never perfect but it was literally great enough to live in, not had billions of public money embezzled in front of everyone and still the people that broke Britain are still taking money from us when our wages have been purposefully kept in stagnation as public services are being decimated. Enough of you reading this either voted Tory or Brexit and you have to admit your failure as well as responsibility for it.
They will name the transgenders as extremist who rape children and babies from afar with telekinesis…. and all the bigots will just agree. 😩
Could have left the post title with just the first two words.
All of this suggests the groups are going to include groups like, say, environmental groups.
Conservative Party UKIP, Reform. Bang that lot of nutters up for 13 years while the country gets sorted out.
99% certain it will continue to criminalize working class white people.
Meanwhile ignoring the cause of 99% of our terrorist deaths because of a “fear of being called racist”
Absolute wankers honestly
Soon-to-be-proscribed terror groups:
– Coalition of Chaos
– Anti-Growth Coalition
– Tofu-Eating Wokerati
– North London Metropolitan Elite
Top of the “Extremism” list should be the UK Government and all their propaganda media outlets that pushed the big fat lie of “Weapons of Mass Destruction” and pushing for war (RE: Murder of innocents in a far away land).
I am still pissed off at this, after all these years – and still, after all these years, the government and the propaganda media outlets are still pushing for wars and the murder of innocents in far away lands.
One might thik that there was a law drafted to strike a tough stance, but without a plan of action to back it up. Which would be both sloppy and dangerous, if true.