Von Russland abgefeuerte nordkoreanische Raketen von „schlechter“ Qualität: Ukraine-Beamter

by Saltedline

35 comments
  1. They should claim that it’s of super high quality, even to the point of perfection, in order to deceive the North Koreans into believing that their weapons are flawless. Humiliating them will only give them motivation to improve, no matter how unlikely that may appear.

  2. But they still kill, right? Don’t underestimate the enemy

  3. I’m not a tank expert, but in that first image, some of the angles on the tank look weird.

  4. Russia – the wish.com of super powers leaning on a dollar store local franchisee for supplies 

  5. The leaders of both those countries can be described in the same words, low quality.

  6. I am shocked. Shocked I tell you! Well, not that shocked.

    Sadly, they still kill.

  7. Does this mean they’re less accurate?

    Does it mean they have a higher dud rate?

    Do they do more damage to the artillery that fires them?

    All of the above?

  8. Imagine getting hand-me-downs from North Korea. How embarrasing.

  9. To be fair, North Korean missiles are only designed to hit large bodies of water.

  10. Of course they are. They’re North Korean FFS

  11. But can buy 2,000 for the cost of one Western one.

  12. During war time there are 2 ways to speak of the enemies weaponry. 1)  they are devastating to the innocents or 2) they are junk. The truth is probably somewhere in between. 

  13. Yes, it is junk, but even if 1 out of 10 will succeed – it will kill people…

  14. Shocking. Kim told Putin his shells were first rate quality and Putin took him up on the offer. It turns out the shells were crap and the only thing Kim got back in return is help to get his crap “spy” satellite and a limo that probably doesn’t work. That’s why Kim is now reduced to a new “super world’s most advanced tank” and his crappy so called Air Force.

  15. No one should be happy about this. NK is making bank selling these weapons to Russia while Russia is sustaining unlimited pressure on Ukraine.

  16. What’s the point of Ukraine saying it if the missiles are actually that low quality?

    If they’re actually that low quality and Russia keeps using them, Russia keeps wasting money for little return and Ukraine benefits.

    It’s more likely that quality is bad but enough of them work that Ukraine still wants them to stop by driving a wedge between NK and Russia.

  17. Murdering the innocent to buy time essentially. Quality isn’t the point. Quantity.

  18. Then I guess Ukraine doesn’t need the money to defend against low quality missiles.

Leave a Reply