Belgian anon doesn’t like Dutch tikkie culture

by Straight_Annual_4980

20 comments
  1. Send him €5.00 tikkie for the extra fuel consumption he caused by treating you like a taxie.

  2. Dutch are visited every year by three ghost at christmas.

  3. Is Holland by the Mediterranean? The man is waiting for you to get out THERE’S NO TIME FOR COFFEE!!!

  4. If someone did that to me I would send them 1 euro and never speak to them again

  5. I don’t understand, that is a greentext, where is the gay sex???

  6. I have never encountered any sort of “tikkie culture”, is this really a thing? In the Netherlands?

  7. Obviously fake.

    Every Dutch person knows that sending such a Tikkie would only provoke a Tikkie for the gas in return.

    We are greedy, not stupid.

  8. The fact that that the Dutch equivalent to CashApp is called “tikkie” is already grounds enough to justify the complete and total annexation of that silly little country by another European country. The natural choices are France, Belgium, or Germany, but I don’t think any of them particularly want it. So perhaps decide it randomly. I’ll use a random number generator to determine who gets the Dutch.

    EDIT: Andorra. We’ll, I for one welcome the new mountain dwelling overlords of tikkie-land

  9. Belgium and 4chan are two of the worst inventions in human history.

  10. This reminds me of early contact between Native Americans and Westerners, before they started meeting face to face. The Native Americans would leave out food and useful gifts at a ceremonial site for the Westerners.

    Westerners took it as a gift or tribute and a good faith gesture for trust building and diplomatic progress towards eventual face to face diplomacy and relationship building. The natives did intend it as a good faith gesture but as a trade. They were expecting the visitors to leave behind goods of their own of similar value. Of course the Westerners left nothing behind and it looked like a hostile action equivalent to looting.

    Because Western trade culture was a narrow one where trade only occurred face to face and more importantly, simultaneously, it didn’t occur that a trade was socially expected where goods were left out for the taking, looking like a gift or tribute from a Western cultural perspective. From the Native cultural perspective it didn’t occur to them that their expected trade would look like a gift and leaving nothing behind looked like a rejection of their friendly gesture of a trade to mutually demonstrate a willingness to cooperate and peacefully coexist.

    A major historical example of the hazards cross-cultural communication.

Leave a Reply