Juve spied on, all the details of the shocking plan tergeting the team

Clockwork espionage at the most delicate moments of the Agnelli administration, with the aim of finding skeletons in closets or evidence of possible crimes. Juventus has repeatedly been in the crosshairs of the abusive dossier that triggered the Perugia maxi-investigation. It has been morbidly studied on at least four different occasions: when Suarez took the famous Italian exam at the University of Perugia, in the stormy days of the club's accession to the Superleague project, when there was talk of Allegri's return to the bench after his two-year sabbatical, and in the hours when Cristiano Ronaldo's transfer became more than a trivial market suggestion. The suspicion of investigators is that there was a plan to create harm to the old governance, perhaps to blow it up. A thesis that some have been maliciously claiming for some time, also in light of the hurricane generated by the Prisma investigation, capable of resetting the entire Board of Directors and conditioning the club between penalties and trials.

But let us return to the investigation into the dossier on politicians, VIPs, entrepreneurs and executives, led by prosecutor Cantone. The coincidence of "Juve-themed" accesses to databases leaves no doubt: those who wanted to strike knew how and when to do it. Suarez's questioning at the University of Perugia for the purpose of obtaining citizenship and then moving to Turin, judged by investigators to be "a farce," triggered, for example, a sensational leak. Is this fact really related to the dossier investigation? That is what the prosecutors suspect today. In the fall of 2020, someone in the Umbrian capital even speculated about the existence of a mole, and the judiciary ascertained in the following months the activity of the former chancellor Guadagno, who downloaded from the database a Guardia di Finanza report related to the Uruguayan, as told yesterday by the newspaper "La Verità." Two and a half years after those events, the activities of the prosecutor of the National Anti-Mafia Directorate, Laudati, and the Finance lieutenant, Striano, accused of illicit intrusions into information systems (the Serpico, Siva, Sdi, Sidna, Cadastre, etc.) to create conditions such as to require the opening of pre-investigative dossiers on subjects not being watched by law enforcement agencies, has emerged on the surface. In the papers it emerges how they both had an interest in Mme.

Juve, what happened with Allegri and Cristiano Ronaldo.
Andrea Agnelli's bank accounts, for example, were searched on April 19, 2021, the morning after Juve (and others) ripped up the Superleague overnight. Someone evidently intended to target the former president, putting him in trouble at a time when he was considered to be leading the rebels. On June 7 it was Allegri's turn, and here again the timing does not seem coincidental: it had been just over a week since the announcement of his return to Juventus, and in the meantime the first inferences about hypothetical payments abroad that could be traced back to online gambling were beginning to surface. A few hours later, the same hand illegally entered, according to magistrates, the profile of Mr. Cristiano Ronaldo dos Santos Aveiro: the Portuguese was preparing for the European Championships and, according to what would emerge only later, on that date he had already expressed his desire to change air. The checks on his account, in the investigative hypotheses, would have arisen to blow up a salvific sale for the ailing accounts of the Bianconeri club. Who did it benefit?