XL Bully owner, 40, becomes UK’s first known prosecution for breaching the new dangerous dog ban after police discover pet called Sully – ‘who would attack anyone who approached it’

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13262273/XL-Bully-owner-40-UKs-known-prosecution-breaching-new-dangerous-dog-ban-police-discover-animal-attack-approached-yard.html

by hypercyanate

7 comments
  1. The court imposed a one-year community order, requiring him to complete 100 hours of unpaid work. He was ordered to pay £85 costs and a £114 surcharge. Magistrates also imposed an order for the dog to be destroyed, pending an appeal.

    Why is this scrote not banned from keeping animals for life?

  2. Why would you want a dog like that, isn’t the companionship part of owning a pet?

  3. The mind boggles. I hope this is seen by others who think they can deceive the law. We know you’re out there.

  4. Using the term “prosecution” in jest here. What an absolute joke.

  5. I mean, we’ve all seen his pictures. Are we surprised that someone like *that* a) has an XL Bully that will kill on command or b) never registered it?

  6. Hmmm named after the heroic pilot who landed an airliner on the Hudson river, or fictional murderer from Top Boy? Any guesses?

  7. “Magistrates also imposed an order for the dog to be destroyed, pending an appeal.”

    So the dog hasent attacked anyone but we can kill it just beacuse it shows aggression and/or has “bad” genetics? how long before we get to do that to people.

Leave a Reply