Paedophile who raped a schoolgirl, 15, but cannot be deported from the UK back to Albania brags ‘I’ve got no worries here’ and says he’s glad he can’t go back because ‘There are lots of bad people there’

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13263551/Paedophile-raped-schoolgirl-15-deported-UK-Albania-brags-Ive-got-no-worries-says-hes-glad-lots-bad-people-there.html

by PlainPiece

19 comments
  1. No surprise the judge was Therese Kamara, who also:

    Blocked the deportation of an Iranian pedophile because he claimed he is bisexual.

    Blocked the deportation of an ISIS extremist AND issued him a new anonymous identity despite Mi5 claiming he was a security threat.

  2. We get it – the judges are morally corrupt, and probably wouldn’t deport these people if their own family members were attacked by them.

    The question is, the system is supposed to have checks and balances in place, so can someone eli5 why there is no overriding decision to deport these people?

  3. Disgrace. This is who are children we now share air with.

  4. Wouldn’t this article open the daily mail up for grounds to be sued for libel? This man raped a 15 year old kid not a prepubescent child (I’m not defending him just fyi to all the Reddit warriors that might be triggered) so branding him as one could be considered libel no?

    Edit: lol looks like my comment was reported and upset some emotionally driven folk of this sub. Shame how far this sub has fallen.

  5. And everyone is happy to have this child abusing paedophile walking the UK streets ? ?

  6. The issue is that you can’t deport someone who is genuinely at risk of torture or death in the receiving country. That’s the law at the moment. 

    Personally I would support there being an exemption to this protection for certain crimes.

  7. His bragging quote sums up this country. We really are too soft.

    Surely there must be clauses in an asylum application/ granted status, that states any convictions will result in deportation? Or, as I suspect, am I being too optimistic.

  8. At this rate people are gonna start taking the law into their own hands. This is beyond ridiculous and so insulting to the poor victim & her family.

  9. No come in guys. The people who come here are all hard working net contributors and the tiny percentage that break the rules get dealt with and deported. If you believe anything else you’ve fallen for the Tory trap apparently.

  10. And yet families are being separated because of stupid visa rules

  11. Better than courts that overrule government, after all the government is based on democracy, whereas a single judge is just that

  12. Sure the sensitive snowflakes who like to protect scum like this. The same people who think Begum is such a lovely young girl but was just led astray because she was so young.

    Fuck her, fuck him and fuck them.

    I don’t care if it’s dangerous for them. I don’t care how dangerous either. You forfeit your privilege to live here when you stick your dick in a child

  13. The decision was published 6 months ago, good to see Fleet street are still fleet of foot.

    You can read it here.

    https://tribunalsdecisions.service.gov.uk/utiac/ui-2022-002588

    Essentially, it boils down to if the Home Office disregards something at the time of making the original decision, they can’t bring it up to change their minds 20 years later.

    This is a good principle – one set out by the Home Office themselves in their own manual for dealing with cases.

    The Home Office also failed to cite public interest in revoking citizenship, which is a bizarre decision on their behalf.

    But of course none of that interests the ‘out of control immigration judges’ narrative.

  14. It’s going to get incredibly ugly before the people actually have enough, if we ever do. It really is proof that those of us that did not go through the struggles of world wars or true economical poverty have been made so much weaker and therefor lost any national pride.

    The crimes that are being squashed are taking society back hundreds of years. In this country and many like it, rape should not be an offence that has an excuse to carry it out and be forgiven.

  15. Why are there no comments on this thread about the individual’s skin colour, culture and or religion?

  16. >However, officers had suspected as early as 2005 that he’d been granted refugee status under a false identity – yet bungling officials failed to take action.

    >Now an immigration tribunal has concluded that it would be ‘unfair’ to strip him of British citizenship when evidence available almost 20 years ago was ‘disregarded’.

    Slow clap for the home office there.

  17. Being in prison as a nonce is far more dangerous than Albania could be no matter how many opps he’s got over there. This outcome is zero bother

  18. Someone could find some “bad people” to introduce themselves to him here, not sayin’, just sayin’.

Leave a Reply