
❗️Military aid, including long-range missiles, will be sent to 🇺🇦Ukraine by the end of next week, — Mark Warner, chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee.
❗️Military aid, including long-range missiles, will be sent to 🇺🇦Ukraine by the end of next week, — Mark Warner, chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee. pic.twitter.com/PCNHchYUyn
— 🇺🇦Ukrainian Front (@front_ukrainian) April 21, 2024
❗️Military aid, including long-range missiles, will be sent to 🇺🇦Ukraine by the end of next week, — Mark Warner, chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee. pic.twitter.com/PCNHchYUyn
— 🇺🇦Ukrainian Front (@front_ukrainian) April 21, 2024
by Orcasystems99
12 comments
By ‘long-range missiles’, do we mean ATACMS? That is, proper ATACMS, unlike the short-range ones sent previously? Will these be sent in bulk?
I’d love to see the US mess with Muscovia and in the inventory of weapons about to be sent include one B-52 strategic bomber. Propagandist’s heads would explode. It could later be described as a “clerical error.”
I would assume the first C 5’s & 17’s are already loaded….
Those are the new ones 300ish km range?
After russias meddling caused so much chaos in US politics over the past, what.. ~7months? I’d dare say Biden in return is going to make damn sure Ukraine is getting all the good long range ATACMS stuff.
Good. Bring down that blasted bridge *NOW*
I don’t think that’s what he said. He hoped it would happen quickly and he thinks the Biden administration is prepared to send them and thanks to this bill it will happen. But whether he talks about long-range ATACMS or short-range ATACMS is not clear.
Deploying advanced long-range missile systems to Ukraine presents strategic and operational risks that could escalate hostilities with Russia. Introducing such high-caliber ordnance risks breaching established red lines, potentially drawing NATO into direct confrontation through the phenomenon of inadvertent escalation. The military doctrine of proportionality must be meticulously observed to avoid an uncontrollable spiraling of the conflict theater. Furthermore, the robustness of conflict containment could be jeopardized, as the deployment of these potent kinetic projectors far beyond the immediate tactical domain may invoke retaliatory measures under the strategic ambiguity of Russia’s escalatory ladder doctrine. Thus, the prudence of calibrated engagement must guide the allocation of our defense assets, maintaining a responsive but restrained posture that prioritizes regional stability and de-escalation within the broader theater of operations.
ATTACAMS BABY!!!
Love Warner! Slava Ukraini from Virginia!
Good we need our fix of Ukraine blowing up Russian war machines.
Kerch bridge be like: “I’m in danger!”