Sunak: Migrants going to Ireland shows Rwanda plan’s deterrent effect working

by Dry-Sympathy-3451

23 comments
  1. Why don’t we have an impractical deterrent thats arguably unenforceable too?

    Asylum seekers have to catch up on the last 10 years of Fair City before they’re claim is granted.

  2. What about Britain’s “international obligations”??

  3. Don’t the Far-Right in this country love the British? They have ties to loyalist groups, are funded by British donors etc. And then the Brits do what the Brits do best – turn around and shit on them. Hope this wakes a few of the numpties up – the Brits don’t care about you, lad. They’re re-routing their asylum seekers here and celebrating you being a useful idiot. Best to take the Irish flag from around your shoulder and put on the gimp suit instead.

  4. We’re a soft touch. It seems like these days we’ll let anyone in. Of course when Rwanda kicks in they’re gonna try come here instead. Half these people are coming from countries which should from reasonably safe countries like Albania and Georgia. We’re being taken for fools, and our Government won’t do jack shit about it

  5. Maybe we should start a North Korea plan. Then the migrants will be thinking Rwanda will be better and return to the UK.

  6. Ah yes, offload the problem onto your neighbours. Great solution.

  7. Yea, people are going to blame Sunak and the UK but theyve made some progress. We;ve done nothing.

  8. Will Ireland every stop suffering from the colonialism of the UK?

  9. Oh, it’s a deterrent now? I remember yer wan saying they were creating a Rwandan utopia for migrants, and all would be wonderful.

  10. I thought it was speculation more would come. Have we actually seen an increase?

  11. Leaving aside the questionable ethics of ‘solving’ a perceived immigrant problem by abusing the GFA, this seems like declaring yourself the winner of a game of soccer because you scored a goal five minutes in. That there’s a knee-jerk reaction now doesn’t mean that people are going to continue going to the UK to cross the border, or that they’ll continue to be deterred if the plan is as unenforceable as it seems to be.

  12. It’s been fantastic folks. Right so, that’s it’s.

    Our population is a lowly 5 million people we’ll be absolutely overwhelmed in a heartbeat.

    Was talking with a UK mate and I think the decision has taken somewhere that we are going to be punished

    1) Not contributing to NATO (ridiculous if you ask me)
    2) Our low corp taxes have been the envy of Europe for a long time hence the tax harmonisation efforts
    3) Our stance on Israel is against Ursula and the EU Commission

    I think we are in bother. Even Sunak stating that so publically will send people here in their droves over the next few weeks.

    What a shitshow.

  13. Yawn. Glad to see the partisan lemmings are still taking the bait.

  14. Guess that shows we need our own ‘Rwanda’ plan

  15. Rishi Sunak is talking 💩.
    It’s an election year and he’s staked his personal credibility on this extremely expensive flagship project that isn’t going to work.

  16. Don’t this guy and his followers blame France for every channel crossing?

  17. Wait a second… “ALWAYS BELIEVE OPPOSITE OF WHAT TORY SAYS”

  18. Oh great, I’m agreeing with Sunak now. Thanks a lot

  19. There is a method to the madness of deporting refugees to be processed in Rwanda for the UK government. It wasn’t about the numbers that would be sent to Rwanda but the deterrent of having a policy like this in the first place.

    Australia implemented something similar and equally controversial with their processing in Naru and repatrating boat people to Cambodia.

    However, it worked. Numbers dropped to near zero for those going to Australia by boat.

    Refugees or economic migrants arent stupid. They will follow the path of least resistance.

  20. I assume this is some kind of Tory nonsense, trying to force us to put up a border or inflame the Irish far right.

Leave a Reply