More than half of asylum seekers allocated for removal to Rwanda cannot be found, according to government’s own report

https://news.sky.com/story/more-than-half-of-asylum-seekers-allocated-for-removal-to-rwanda-cannot-be-found-according-to-governments-own-report-13126025

by insomnimax_99

25 comments
  1. No surprise they just abscond as soon as they arrive anyways. Have to check in but they never bother

  2. They have fled to Ireland according to past headlines…

  3. The sheer incompetence is off the charts. Either people have absconded in fear of being removed or the Home Office have simply lost track of where people are.

    It doesn’t really matter, the basic point is that they have lost control of the process completely. Whether you agree with the Rwanda policy or not also doesn’t matter, we should always know where people who are seeking asylum are and their cases and right to remain in the UK should be established as quickly as possible.

  4. They should put the immigration centres in the outer Hebrides, plenty of space there and little chance of losing them. If they get leave to stay move them to the main land if not straight to Rwanda.

  5. If I’m not mistaken, this must mean they’re not turning up for their meetings which also means their asylum claims are now cancelled.

    So they are no longer asylum seekers, are just plain illegal immigrants and were probably never seeking asylum to begin with otherwise they’d have turned up to progress their case instead of absconding.

    It’s a real confirmation that you’ve assessed a situation accurately when even headlines that are supposed to be read as negatives end up confirming what you say.

  6. If you’re an asylum seeker you don’t abscond immediately after claiming asylum…

    What a surprise that they’re all just illegal migrants looking for work / benefits / looking to be engaged in criminal activity under the radar

  7. So the Rwanda scheme seems to be working in a strange way.

    If we could track the people who are here then we could deport to Rwanda for processing, given that they have breached the arrangement (attend meetings) they would likely be denied.

  8. So even if they are working, they are not paying tax. Great. Our country is run by clowns and I don’t know who to vote for that would make it any less tragic than it already is.

  9. Shocking. Or not.

    I remember a bbc documentary from at least 15 years ago stating that there were more than 50,000 asylum seekers that had neglected to turn up to assessments and had vanished.

    The left say “this is fine”

    The right say “blow them out the water before they get here”

    I dont agree with either, but fucking hell this isn’t OK is it.

  10. Proving they don’t have a clue who they are, true numbers, or any form of accountability.

    Mass illegal immigration MUST end! Mass deportations MUST begin and be completed. This is nuts.

  11. We want to keep track of them but we can’t intern them or put ankle tags on or do anything to track them because that infringes their human rights. How else would this go in that case?

  12. Good.

    This just confirms they are illegals and not here with good faith.

    I don’t see a problem.

    They were always going to hide.

  13. If I were an asylum seeker and wanted to live in the UK, say I had family here, or was attracted by future job prospects and standard of living.. I’d also disappear when they tried to get me on a one-way plane to Rwanda.

  14. God, the government really is bad at their jobs. Were these on the PM’s Whatsapps?

  15. Its almost as if they arent actually asylum seekers !

  16. If only someone had implemented a proper system to track and house them and process their claims speedily, rather than wasting time on performative, costly, ineffectual Rwanda bollocks and 3 word slogans.

  17. I find it funny that all the do-gooders crying about how this reflects the HO’s incompetence don’t seem to realise that the only solution to this is putting every single one of these chancers into prison or detention centres until we’ve processed them. And conveniently if we did that, they’d then be the ones crying about how the UK is using concentration camps to punish all those poor ~~illegal immigrants~~ asylum seekers.

  18. What did they expect? Letting thousands of illegal immigrants into the country without vetting them or doing any sort of due diligence. Of course they’re just going to go missing.

  19. Nicola Murray: “There has been a massive irretrievable data loss. The last 7 months worth of new immigrant details have gone, apparently lost in the computer”

    Malcolm Tucker: “Oh.” *Laughs insanely*

  20. But none of them falsely claimed refugee status right? Because that doesn’t happen right? And enemies of the west would never use this one weird trick to cary out attacks. Right?

  21. Just googling, Rwanda looks pretty nice and I bet the weather is better.

  22. Came here via boat aiding and supporting human traffickers? Instant deportation.
    Destroyed your ID? Instant deportation to Rwanda 
    Cant prove who you are? Instant deportation

    Zero legal funding whatsoever,fuck the human rights cartel and the endless human rights appeals.Government grow a pair and do what they’ve been elected to do regardless.

  23. This is nothing short of a farce. A well staffed, well run and well organised immigration system would stop this happening. What we have however is a government willing to spend all their money on a half-baked Rwanda plan.

  24. Surprised it isn’t higher. Simple solution, just round up all the deliveroo drivers clogging the high streets, they’re mostly illegals. Record vacancies in the NHS but everyday scores of deliveroo drivers riding dangerously on pavements. We’re not importing the best or brightest here. Brain drain underway and we’re importing 3rd world unskilled.

  25. Maybe the policy is kinda working even though it’s a dumb policy

Leave a Reply