Die Ukraine hat bei einem Angriff 100 russische Soldaten auf einmal vernichtet und damit die Reichweite und Leistungsfähigkeit ihres neuen US-amerikanischen ATACMS demonstriert

https://www.businessinsider.com/ukraine-new-long-range-atacms-kill-100-russia-soldiers-distant-2024-5

39 comments

  3. This sucks. Imagine being an 18-year-old kid sent to meat grinder and losing your life or being handicapped for life.. All these horrors for what? Why do they always send the poor to war?

  6. This brings back horror memories when footage from the recent Karabah war, HD videos of whole platoons being whipped by drone attacks.

    Unless there is some really high tech anti drone system present infantry is really screwed on the modern battlefield.

  7. I read that they used 4 missiles. Will 1 have done the job? Or were the russians spread out

  8. Well now there’s a whole bunch of Russian families that won’t get their money. “Good news comrade mother, we found no identifiable remains of your son. Bad news, he’s presumed defector, no lada or fish. Womp womp”

  9. The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn’t. By subtracting where it is from where it isn’t, or where it isn’t from where it is (whichever is greater), it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is to a position where it isn’t, and arriving at a position where it wasn’t, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn’t, and it follows that the position that it was, is now the position that it isn’t.
    In the event that the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn’t, the system has acquired a variation, the variation being the difference between where the missile is, and where it wasn’t. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was.
    The missile guidance computer scenario works as follows. Because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is. However, it is sure where it isn’t, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subtracts where it should be from where it wasn’t, or vice-versa, and by differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn’t be, and where it was, it is able to obtain the deviation and its variation, which is called error.

  10. Putin: “They can’t do that! Shoot back at them… or something!”

  12. Putin be like “A grim day for Russian World. Eh, but we can always hire more killbots.”

  13. so that is 25 dead per 1 ATACM, that either means ammo depots/airfields are out of range or Ukraine has literally received thousands of those that they can waste them like this?

  14. Give them the right weapons and there won’t be any trench warfare

  15. Is it safe to say – if it wasn’t for US arms, Ukraine would lose the war?

  17. I don’t like to hear about conscripted soldiers being killed. That’s not eliminating the source of the problem at all

  18. I was reading about the ATACMS missile system and it seems to spread managed democracy pretty well. I think it’s a great Ukrainian strategem to use aside from the Orbital Laser.

  19. Russian army uses cluster amunition on civilians and gas on defenders… fuck em all i say.

  20. I just gotta say.. I think it’s sick and sad this is happening in our world right now.

  22. Is this the Steak-umm’s of the military arsenal?

    “Need the Russians gone fast? Crush those red bastards by dinner time, with US Attack-Umms!”

  23. Holy s*** how big of an explosion do those missiles make

  24. Every time I see this story the number is different so I’m just reading them all as “some Russians died”

  25. I know I know, but it’s things like this that make me worry about Vlad getting mad.

  28. It feels wrong kind of cheering for a hundred deaths, but here we are.

  29. Great news. The bear gets poked again. Putin needs more meat for the grinder.

  30. “What should we call these weapons?”

    “Well, I dunno. You just…point them at the enemy, and you attack em…”

    “Ah!”

  31. Shit, someone had a picture of how these absolutely shredded a tin roof, but now I can’t find/remember the post it was on. Anyone know what I’m talking about ?

  32. I’m not sure, but seem to recall it being a quote of a Roman Senator

  33. Hopefully a few stragglers lived. It’d be nice for them to tell all the other new recruits how quickly everything went silent.

  37. Meanwhile we got Politicians benefiting off the sponsorship of this war.

  38. ATACMs is such a great name for a weapon system

    r/weaponsystems

Leave a Reply