Macron’s threats of Nato troops in Ukraine could become a reality if Putin’s forces push west

I don’t think it’s realistic for troops from a NATO country to fight on the ground at the moment um however one of the scenarios that I think president macron or those that are trying to interpret his comments have suggested is that um there could be troops from a NATO contributing country or other countries that go onto the ground to uh protect Ukraine’s borders with the likes of um Belarus so that the Ukrainian troops that are currently stuck protecting those deterring Bel or attack any attacks coming from Belarus could be freed up to go off to the front line that is a better possibility but I still think it is uh you know it would be a very brave move um and one which uh would be very difficult to um do safely because the Russians would potentially try and use those French troops or other troops as a Target is macron politically isolated on this or or is he sort of speaking to a growing groundwell of opinion that it may come to having troops on the ground well we’re seeing a shift in opinion um and we’ll have to work out why macron is doing this um because you it was only in the the first year of the war he was turning around saying that we shouldn’t humiliate the humiliate the Russians and it seems now that he has changed his tune completely and we you remember macron was phoning Putin was trying to go and see Putin and everything else and now he is is one of the more vocal European um uh leaders on um how we should deal with the Russians um I think what he’s seeing is what the UK is doing and the UK is being quite forward leaning in a lot of what’s going on there and he recognizes how that is working um in getting additional support from Ukraine it’s uh something that will set the UK up in a in a good way should there be a trump presidency remember Donald Trump wanted um you other countries to be as as forward leaning as as America is so that he could continue his support so he’s doing that but more cynically um I’d say he’s he’s looking at the rise of the left wing and right wing within France and he’s got elections coming up and will be putting something in to trying to appease them and and put himself out as you more of the hard man of Europe you we’ve it’s no coincidence that we’ve seen photographs of macron in his boxing gloves you with shirt off and all the rest of it trying to look um you this this strong man almost in a Putin esque way um and the even greater cynic in me would turn around and say he’s trying to build his relationship up with Ukraine so that whenever it comes to rebuilding Ukraine several years down the line that France is in a strong position to negotiate with the Ukrainian government this is something that France did uh a long time ago when it came to the rebuilding of Saro um after the uh the Bosnian War um and they they positioned themselves very quickly to be somewhere where French companies could get the contract to uh rebuild that so in one way I think he’s been brave the other way um and the other reasoning I think I’m slightly cynical you mentioned Donald Trump a moment ago it’s interesting the times is now reporting that that he would force NATO members to spend 3% of their GDP on defense if he were to win the White House again in November what do you make of that yeah it’s it’s interesting you Donald Trump turning around threat threatening to withdraw from NATO it’s scaring a lot of NATO members because you they have been living off the generosity of the Americans for so many years uh America is spending significantly more than that they um agreed two and a half percent um UK has always been or agreed 2% UK has always been 2% or or above um as have only one or two other nations France Germany um were were you know France was just underneath Germany and other countries were significantly below that and president Trump basically if you analyze what he said in a an aggressive business type way he’s effectively said if you don’t pay your dues you won’t get the support um and American Support is vital um for the success of NATO and and everything else we’re starting to see NATO leaders waking up a little bit um they’re now a lot more coming up to the 2% but you know it’s what what you spend that 2% on and it it it takes a long time to build that into a capable military um capability and of course Trump when he comes in is going to try and do something to stir it even more especially if he sees that the comments that he made when he was president beforehand have started this move towards greater expenditure because he would love to withdraw some of the American Support back and keep that reinvestment going into continental United States but looking Beyond Trump the biggest threat and the longer term threat is southeast Asia and down into down with China so he will want to be setting up um his expenditure his his long-term planning and thinking to be able to Pivot to there and not have to continue to support Europe whenever the EU is you’re a pretty rich par block wanted to ask you philli about comments by General Pavo who’s the commander of Ukraine’s Ground Forces he’s been speaking to the time special correspondent Anthony Lloyd and he says that Ukraine is suffering whilst too many countries sit on their hands yeah is that right oh completely you know we we look at you what has caused ukrain stalling of their their counter offensive they they almost went too early in their counter offensive because they couldn’t generate local Air superiority to attack into what are some of the most complex and difficult defensive positions possible but International um commentary um and and pressure from governments want wanted them to go but but the American Americans for purely domestic politics when the Speaker of the House refused to allow the vote to go through for the aid package that Aid package was vital for the release of um anti-air missiles for artillery shells which are very very basic in what is a an artillery slug at the moment on the front line um and a lot more military material the ukrainians PID for that delay in in lives and I think we’re see we’re also seeing a a lot of the promises that have come from European countries and from the UK not translating into um military material getting into Ukraine in any timely manner now that I think is for two reasons one reason um countries have suddenly realized that if they do give what they’re promised their own stocks of ammunition and the like will be run down to dangerously low levels and in many cases that’s below what um you is ordinarily agreed and would would then suggest that there would have to be more public debate about it and that’s worrying and the second thing is um I think there’s been this misconception that the defense industrial base across Europe um in in military terms was able to just flick a switch and generate all of this additional material um at very short notice and they suddenly realized it’s not at short notice it’s it’s going to take you months years to be able to build up to the capacity that is needed with the ukrainians um and uh that has been paid for by Ukrainian lives and just finally Philip president macron in his comments said it shouldn’t be ruled out having troops in NATO countries on the ground if Russia makes a significant breakthrough what do you think he would classify as a significant breakthrough well the front the front line of the moment I I suspect if the Russians managed to get a formation that would punch through the Ukrainian defenses um ukrainians are are doing a very clever military um activity at the moment they’re trading space for time um so they’re giving uh away to the Russians as they come in giving them that little bit of land and that time they’re using to get the the new ammunition in the new missiles in to to to get everything ready to hold them and and then and then punch forward again but but if the Russians managed to push through and potentially showed uh the ability to get further um uh into Ukraine pushing towards cave or pushing towards um some some of the other cities that that that you’ve got before I think that’s when maon would sit up and and think about it but he he’s looking very much at domestic politics at the moment whether his words would translate into actions is something that I’m slightly skeptical about

Ex-intelligence officer Philip Ingram reacts to President Macron’s threats of Nato troops on the ground in Ukraine.

📻 Listen to Times Radio – https://www.thetimes.co.uk/radio

📍 Subscribe to our channel – http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCTjDhFuGXlhx9Us0gq0VK2w?sub_confirmation=1

🗞 Subscribe to The Times https://www.thetimes.co.uk/subscribe/radio-3for3/

📲 Get the free Times Radio app https://www.thetimes.co.uk/radio/how-to-listen-to-times-radio/app

43 comments
  1. Good for Macron. About time someone stood up to little boy Putin. It is challenging but we have to be firm, committed, to head off far worse if we are weak.

  2. 😂😂😂Poots will blow all their "boots on ground" clown show away ! Ending in a tearful "I told you we should should just fool around somewhere in the middle east" between nato and usa 😂😂😂

  3. Why send troops when there's still so much that can be sent in the way of equipment? If the West actually sent weapons in the quantity and at the right time, NATO troops wouldn't be necessary.

  4. The French public can become vary agitated and does not hesitate to show it. Macron has already had large public demonstrations. Actually, I am surprised he is still in office. When Frenchman start returning home in coffins things will start happening.

  5. Macron needs to shut up. He’s been appeasing Hizbollah in Lebanon for years and got kicked out of Africa. Too big for his britches.

  6. N'élisez jamais un dirigeant qui n'a pas d'enfants, car il ne sera pas préoccupé par l'avenir et toutes ses décisions seront basées sur son image actuelle et quand il sera parti, la dernière chose dont il se soucie, ce sont ses descendants car ils n'en ont pas.

  7. If Putin isn't stopped now, it will be the beginning of tears of rolling further and further west for him.

  8. THEY WANT TO GO INTO WORD WAR 111 JUST A BLOOD BATH MY GOD TALK ABOUT ISRAEL WESTERN COUNTRIES ARE MORE GUILTY MACRON IS NOT A STRONG MAN HE HASNT BEEN TESTED

  9. This all comes down to dispelling Putin's assumption that the West is cowering and the US is disengaging. If Ukraine falls then he'll continue to undermine bordering governments with disinformation and political interference. Putin must be convinced that his worldview is wrong.

  10. Trump does not care about democracy. Period. Do any of you know what’s going on in the US? Trump is a fascist. He loves Putin. He will likely withdraw from NATO even when all countries are paying their share.

  11. DUDE! You simply HAVE to get a sound specialist to organize your gear and that of the guests. In this case, Mr. Ingram's sound is excellent, but yours has a muffled reverberation. Your face is also darkened because of the bright windows around it. Look at the most basic visual and acoustic rules, but get another to do it, as you don't have the eye or ear yourself. Many of us REALLY APPRECIATE the great material you offer! Get your audio-visual act together please.

  12. Jist hot air.if Nato wanted a fight with Russia they wld have entered long time ago.truth is they fear Russia and all we get is such garbage. I'm sure we all hv heard of colonel McGregor and Scott Ritter.those are ppl who talk sense

  13. If Macron is positioning France for when Ukraine's rebuild happens that is exactly why I woukd like to see Australia give more help. It's not the only reason of course but I don’t see that there's a problem with that thinking.

  14. WE IN BRITAIN HAVE NO ENEMY IN RUSSIA. ITS NOTHING TO DO WITH US..WE DO NOT WANT . ARMAGEDDON 'MACRON IS A WEF TURS LIKE SUNAK ZELENSKY 'NETANYAHU 'TREUDO BIDEN . WE NEED TO STOP THIS AGENDA

  15. France,British and the USA have failed to defeat simple jihadists in the sahel region of Africa for decades and u tell us they can take on Russia. The recent parade of all those so called invincible weapons in Moscow is a testament ti ir delusional thinking

  16. Sounds to me like Macron is right on the money. Nato should have walked in when Russian started massing at the border. We wouldnt have this problem now.

  17. All you EU members talk a big game especially British and French well let’s see you talk like this when Trump gets into office!!!!! He will get out of nato because American’s are tired of the EU and Britain riding on Americans hard earned tax dollars. So now we see Ukraine is burning pictures of President Trump ok just remember karma what goes around comes around. The 61 billion to ukrain will not make a bit of difference to the outcome of this war, the only thing this will do is make Russia more mad. Trump 2024!!!!!!! Make America Great Again!!!!!!!

Leave a Reply