Die NATO definiert „rote Linien“ für den Kriegseintritt der Ukraine mit Russland

https://newsukraine.rbc.ua/news/nato-defines-red-lines-for-ukraine-s-entry-1714908086.html

27 comments

  1. I’m sorry, have I just been having a fever dream for the last two and a half years? Are they not at war already?

  2. The caption is a little misleading, the article is discussing red line’s for NATO’s possible entry into the conflict, things like a provocation against NATO members or an expansion of the war involving Belarus, etc.

  3. It’s high time NATO draws the line. Guess the saying, better late than never applies

  4. See why couldn’t nato have postured like this regarding the original invsasions… then ukraine wouldn’t be fighting and russia would still be an ignorant bumbling idiot of a country with no idea of its internal military problems. Appeasement never works.

  5. *Article Basically Says: Attack on NATO member state/Baltic states or Moldova to the surprise of no one. Nothing about entering the conflict in Ukraine if the situation on the ground their changes, and no new statement by NATO.

    Edit: Read the article if your curious; just noting this is an unofficial interpretation of NATO policy without a source. Not a statement by NATO as the poorly worded, and confusing (Ukraine’s entry into war with Russia???), title may lead you believe.

    >NATO has confidentially and unofficially identified at least two “red lines” that could lead to the Alliance’s direct intervention in the war in Ukraine, according to to Repubblica.

  6. This article is mostly speculation
    Currently, NATO cannot even guarantee all its full members that article 5 stands for each and every them.
    Orban would send Hungarian troops to defend Latvia against a Russian invasion? Nah, thoughts and prayers.

    Putin wants to rebuild the defensive belt and zone of influence of the Russian socialist soviet Republic as a strategic priority. Ukraine and Belarus are the first two tactical objectives. Destroying nato is only one of many ways to go

    Western Europe still does not viscerally feel that East Berlin is a very real possibility within 5 years.

    The time for nato to draw red lines was ten years ago when Putin invaded Crimea

  7. This article is so fucking stupid.

    There are so many BS assumptions.

  8. Lemme title a news article *cracks knuckles.
    ” war communism slams NATO and 911! experts report”

    do you like it?

  10. Russia wont attack NATO, because it is and was never part of the plan. All the postering and nuclear Saber rattling is all posture to prevent Nato from entering to assist Ukraine
    Because Russia knows it it won’t win if NATO got directly involved.

    Russia plan was to conquer Ukraine install puppet regime friendly towards Russia, and reap all that oil and gas, and keep Europe sucking on Russias breast teet for oil and gas.

    When their 3 day military operation failed, and has continued for three years, Putin is in too deep to fall back now, because if he did he would look weak and probably be killed and kicked out of office.

    I’d argue that Ukraine taking back Chrimea would probably be the catalyst of Russia losing the war because Putins top brass would be unhappy that this 3 day military operation caused them to lose what they stole back in 2014.

  11. This title is fucked up. Makes it sound like ukraine went into this willingly. 

  12. So basically the first red line is NATO troops in Ukrainian uniforms enter Belarus and the second is a false flag bombing of Moldova. Got it!

  13. Every single measure beyond boots in the ground should be implemented immediately. This has gone on for far too long. If we want this to end and send China a strong message about Taiwan bitch slapping those poxy mongrel Russians back across the border should be done today.

  14. Read article and it is largely about whether Belarus becomes a front or remains quasi-neutral. Apparently nobody read article.

  16. Chemical weapons were considered a red line and now when Russia is using them we’re redefining the red lines…

  19. Belarus was already involved in this war, definitely more directly than any of NATO forces. This is a nothing burger like Marcon’s empty postering. NATO’s inaction now will only make it harder for the rest of the world when there is a wider conflict.

  22. What is going on with that headline? And the article isn’t much better.

  25. This is pure russian propaganda where they pretend NATO is a political entity that makes decisions.

  26. At the starting of the week. At summit talks, you’ll hear them speak……

  27. Is the red line at the bottom of the Russian Flag?

Leave a Reply