Allegations of chemical weapons use: is Moscow ‘out of ideas’? • FRANCE 24 English

turn to Melinda Harring she’s the senior fellow at the Atlantic council’s Eurasia Center Melinda thanks so much for joining us these are obviously big allegations uh by the United States not the first time as mentioned uh how would they go about proving that these chemical weapons have in fact been used hi Jean so we’ve seen the ukrainians make these accusations for months now Ukrainian soldiers have been complaining that they have Burns in their mouths and that they o have burns on their faces so I I think that this is the the the announcement by the state department has been um in in the making for months and months uh the the state department has been working with the Ukrainian side to get enough evidence in order to support this claim and if you notice that the claim the statement that that the the state department put out yesterday was very firm it said that this is not an isolated incident they’ve seen many many incidents like this so they have a lot of evidence to come out uh W with the statement that they put out yesterday and of course taking such a strong stance against the dangers of chloropicrin that’s the the chemical they allege has been used how dangerous is it on the front lines for those Ukrainian soldiers if it is being used so it’s dangerous it’s prohibited by uh International treaties but I think mo more significantly it says something about the Russian side and and where they are in terms of the war so in that statement you put up for from the state department the the Washington is saying Moscow is annoyed that it can’t get Kiev uh that it can’t force the soldiers out of these defensive fortifications so they’re now turning to ban chemical weapons so Moscow uh is using uh illegal you know it it doesn’t have any other it’s tried every sort of conventional way to make the ukrainians move uh and they’re they’re out of ideas so they’re turning to chemical weapons it shows sort of how Des Moscow is to try to change uh the the the military uh means on the ground but its desperation means it is finding a way to make these weapons if these allegations turn out to be true and in order to do so it would require uh companies assistance mining companies now the US says it will be sanctioning uh what it believes are to be those mining companies that they’re not necessarily in Russia that are helping the Russian forces with these weapons uh do we have any more information as of yet who they could be so Jan the package of sanctions that came out is pretty large it’s about 280 different organizations and a couple of things stick out I think this may be a pretty effective package the state department is looking for sanctions evaders so it it’s uh hitting uh different companies in Turkey uh in kyrgistan which has been a problem in Malaysia and it’s also aimed at the Chinese and if you dig through a lot of the this the the information around the sanctions package the state department has said that if we were able to really tighten sanctions on the PRC on China it would make it incredibly hard for Russia to continue to prosecute the war the the Russian side has been getting almost all their drones uh their pieces from China so this is an attempt to squeeze uh and to try to prevent that from happening well I want to follow on from that because it’s very important how these sanctions actually can uh Pro to be effective uh do you see them being effective if if they’re looking to actually punish Russia for this act is sanctioning the right way to go Jean sanctions are not perfect they don’t change Behavior but they make it more difficult for Russia to continue the war so yes and I think that you have to look at it in the context the United States Congress has finally put a package together the weapons package that the ukrainians have been begging for for months and months and months and you and I have talked many times about the rationing that the ukrainians face of the front lines so as the United States in the west surges up military might on the front lines it is definitely appropriate to Surge with sanctions as well and now obviously then the question goes to uh those same components that you’ve just mentioned that are helping in uh weapons and other military items in Russia they create them using components and often times that is from the West itself how does the United States how does Europe then Target maybe its own companies which through third countries those weapons and possibly now in this case Mining and chemicals are reaching Russia so this is not an easy thing to keep your your finger on uh the sanctions lists have to be constantly updated uh and finding ways to uh eliminate sanctions evaders is really important but also just being on on top top of uh the behavior of of companies so the the target is always changing uh in the state department the treasury Department both in the United States and in Western countries have to keep those sanctions lists active and keep updating them so just a final follow-up question how do you see this uh playing out now in terms of any kind of immediate response at least uh directly from the United States to Russia or the West at large so Russia has denied the claims but look this is typical Russian Behavior we’ve seen them use chemical weapons in in Britain we’ve seen them use chemical weapons on their own people with Alexa Nali so in some senses this is terrible ugly Behavior but it’s predictable I think that the West is going to continue to ratchet up the pressure with sanctions and with weapons and and I think that Russia has finally seen that the West is serious when it says we will be with Ukraine for as long as it takes an interesting uh thought there Melinda thanks so much uh for for just uh Opening Our Eyes into this situation that’s Melinda har Harring she’s the senior fellow at the Atlantic council’s Eurasia Center and talking all about those accusations of Russia using chemical weapons uh in Ukraine well turning now to uh

The Kremlin has rejected allegations by the US that Russian forces had used a “chemical weapon” in Ukraine. According to the US State Department, Moscow has been turning to banned chemical weapons because its efforts to dislodge Ukrainian soldiers in trenches are being frustrated. Melinda Haring, Senior fellow at the Atlantic Council’s Eurasia Center, speaks to Jean-Emile Jammine.
#Russia #Ukraine #NATO

🔔 Subscribe to France 24 now: https://f24.my/YTen
🔴 LIVE – Watch FRANCE 24 English 24/7 here: https://f24.my/YTliveEN

🌍 Read the latest International News and Top Stories: https://www.france24.com/en/

Like us on Facebook: https://f24.my/FBen
Follow us on X (Twitter): https://f24.my/Xen
Browse the news in pictures on Instagram: https://f24.my/IGen
Discover our TikTok videos: https://f24.my/TKen
Get the latest top stories on Telegram: https://f24.my/TGen

34 comments
  1. This is the highest form of propaganda… Russia that is making rapid gains every minutes use chemical weapons? Wow these people…if you are using this as a false flag to use it over there, then think twice, because Russia has it in abundance.

  2. Yes the missiles they use contain chemical , beaware of putin mind, evwrsince the UN ,NEVER EVER WAKE UP , NEVER EVER CONDEMN PUTIN BY UN , REMOVE RUSSIAN AMBASSADOR , THEY ARE USELESS TO PEOMOTE UNITY BETWEEN TWO COUNTRY , THEY ARE FAILURE T THE WORLD

  3. Here in the US the police commonly use chemical weapons against campus protests. Those people are unarmed and not combatants. So the logic you advance is that it is ok to use chemical weapons against unarmed protestors but not armed combat troops. What's next, crys of weapons of mass destruction. .

  4. Instead of wondering about it, why not be proper journalists and go investigate? Why rely on the totally untrustworthy Ukrainians?

  5. 😂😂😂arrogant usa and its puppies lost thier proxy war to defeat Russia and now shouting Russia used chemical weapon😁😁😁😁RUSSIA IS WINNNG BIG😂😂😁

  6. Russia's strategic forces, long-range aviation, cyber capabilities, space capabilities, and capabilities in the electromagnetic spectrum have lost no capacity at all. The air force has lost some aircraft, but only about 10 percent of their fleet. – Us general Christopher G Cavoli (congress in Europe April 10 2024).

  7. Who is desperate in this scenario is it Russia or Ukraine.after sanctions became futile in Russia, west is looking for other alternatives to drag in China and turkey to the conflict.

  8. Don't interview anyone from the Altantic council. It's just a mouthpiece of the US government and the CIA. Russia get dual use components from China? Where do U think the Ukrainians are getting their drones components from? Who are purchasing these components from China? Ask France where they are getting their LNG from? Ask the US where is it getting it's uranium from? Give me a break!

  9. Russia is winning. France is considering sending troops. Macron is trying to justify sending French fathers and sons to Ukraine. Who is desperate?

  10. What type of chemical weapon? Just tear gas? nerve? Didn't we learn from the horrors of gas warface in WW1?

  11. Chloropicrin is not used in ANY Soviet-era munitions. It has not been used since WW1 and is only used in Western countries as an herbicide. It is not a component of any modern Western or Russian chemical weapon inventory. It is therefore logical to conclude that any presence of it is due to colateral secondary effects of a strike munition releasing it from a facility storing it. An event known in the military as a TIC/TIM event. TIC/ TIM are Toxic Industrial Chemicals and Toxic Industrial Materials and are a common chemical hazard on the modern battlefield. The only other explanation would be the detonation of a long-buried gas shell from WW1 and I don't think those types of weapons were used away from the Western Front or the area around Tannenberg.

  12. Oh Dear! The Russian trolls are out in force, like in the first days of the war! That in itself lends credibility to the allegations.

Leave a Reply