NATO will directly intervene in war if Russia crosses one of two red lines – La Repubblica

8 comments

1. So, basically not a red line, but more of a pastel pink line. That’s what happens when you use the word “may”. And on top of that zero actual PLAN for how to react, meaning even if a red line is crossed nothing happens. I am guessing Scholz wrote this with input from Sullivan? What the actual fuck?

2. Take it for what it is, the tone has changed slightly. A year ago talking of NATO troops taking active part was a no-no or very marginalized.

3. Are nukes a red line? Chemical weapons a red line? No?

4. Macron set the real red line. A major russian breakthrough (implicating tens of millions of Ukrainian refugees).

5. >it is noted that there are currently no operational plans that would involve sending troops, but only assessments of possible emergency actions

   “If you cross the red line, we may plan for emergency actions against you!”

   This is ridiculous!

6. We should have gone there for a long time. UAF are doing what for NATO has been created…

   Genocid? Red line. And Nato did not go in.

   Chemicals weapon? Red line. And Nato did not go in.

7. Red lines have become som sort of new buzzword how many red lines have both Russia and China ignored without any strong responses.

8. no we wont. just new red lines