Russia says it will consider F-16 fighter jets in Ukraine as “carriers of nuclear weapons” regardless of their modification.



by Baysdarby

36 comments

  2. The West will consider Russia to be a non nuclear-weapon state, regardless of what the Kremlin says.

  5. And I will consider Putin a dildo holster, regardless of his “modification”.

  6. More commie nuclear threats on humanity by terrorist state russia

  7. Anything you write after “russia says” is meaningless.

  8. In which case, we might as well ensure they all have the capability to deliver nukes.

  9. So, what is their goal here? To try to scare Europe into reneging on providing f-16s? If so, I think it’s too late for that. The blustering by Russia is a weapon that is less and less effective. They have overused it. Also, they must really not want Ukraine to have a couple of squadrons of f-16s. Great.

  13. Ukraine had nukes and gave them to you allready. Shame really.

  15. By such definition their TU95s that skim the British coast…alsaka..Scandinavia.. along with their fighter escorts are the same?

  16. So? Russia perceives itself as a modern country of family values.

  17. Can you smell that? That’s the smell of Russian fear….

  18. Fuck off Russia, consider yourself the biggest arseholes of this world.

  19. So what’s the goal here? Serious question.
    As soon as “nuclear” F16’s appear over Ukraine, Russia will (insert comment) in accordance with (insert comment).

  20. That’s fine. NATO should consider any ballistic missile launch as likewise, and shoot it down just in case.

    Let’s use this to declare Western Ukraine an ADZ.

  21. Same can be said about balsitic missiles and hypersonic missiles on the EU border

    Russia can’t make statements like that if they want to be taken seriously as they will be ignored..

    Or by the sames standard it cranks up tensions on the EU border.

    Same with Iranian balsitic missiles sent to Israel.

    You assume they have no nuclear intent because the ramifications would be great if they did.

    There won’t be a provocative escalation in response to F16s

  22. That’s fine. NATO should consider any ballistic missile launch as likewise, and shoot it down just in case.

    Let’s use this to declare Western Ukraine an ADZ.

  24. Every time russia makes a threat like that, we all know Putin is afraid and had a little accident with his nappies.

  26. It’s hilarious that they haven’t realized how hard these threats backfire. Countries aren’t going to cower in a corner when Russia delivers nuclear threat #3721, they’re going to look for the best way to protect themselves. Sometimes, that protection comes in the form of more supplies and weapons to Ukraine.

  28. They must really be crapping their pants for some 50yo jets.

  29. Tell me your terrified of F-16s without telling me.

    Of course, it could be a tactic to get them to commit F-16s because secretly they have a crossbow that is +5 against F-16s.

  32. Just a continuation of all the over-the-top hyperbole by ruzzia – such scare mongering propaganda is its best weapon. They just hope you don’t attempt to think through these idiotic statements as of course they fall apart immediately. But it works well on the MAGA types.

  33. Typical Russian nonsense. They said the same thing about tank shells

  36. Are they trying to imply that this somehow breaks the Budapest Memorandum?

Leave a Reply