The chairman of the presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina strikes at the basis of the Dayton peace agreement and the B&H constitution – the constituent peoples

4 comments
  1. [The translated article](https://hms-ba.translate.goog/uzurpator-udario-na-temelje-daytonskog-mirovnog-sporazuma-i-ustava-bih-konstitutivnost-naroda/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=bs&_x_tr_pto=wapp). The original title does just refer to him as a “usurper”, which he is, but I found it better to refer the man by his post rather than such a moniker.

    In short, according to this man, a country like Belgium has no place in Europe, as well as putting all blame for B&H being this awful at Croatia and Serbia. What to expect from a clown that glorifies both a neofascist paramilitary general and a communist dictator at the same time?

  2. Why is it still a thing that Bosnia has to rotate presidents to be fair towards all the religious parties? Hasn’t Bosnia always even before the civil war been a multi-religious country, and they only had one president at a time then too? Who can take the governance of a country seriously with this tit for tat type of politics? And why isn’t Serbia and Croatia subjected to the same thing, if we’re really being petty?

    I apologize if my questions are far off from the article context, I can’t read the content but just wanted to ask the question as I saw Bosnia mentioned, hopefully some locals with a better understanding of local politics can help me out.

  3. Why is there so much pressure on Bosnia from its neighbors?

    They should have democracy and elect one president.

    This situation creates a status quo that breeds corruption and makes a disaster country.

Leave a Reply