Gina Rinehart, die reichste Frau Australiens, fordert, dass die Galerie ihr Porträt entfernt

https://news.sky.com/story/australias-richest-woman-gina-rinehart-demands-gallery-removes-her-portrait-13137082

43 comments

  1. Classic Streisand-Effect now in motion 😎. I see zero difference between the photos: Which one is the painting?

  4. If she didn’t think it looked like her, she wouldn’t be angry

  6. *Rich white demands native aboriginal artist remove their work.*

    Just a working title.

  8. Man, if I were that rich I wouldn’t give af about some portrait. Nowadays a teenager with a shitty computer can generate much worse portraits of anyone in a matter of minutes.

  10. All us poors love it when billionaires make vanity demands.

  11. But how would they know which is which? They’re both the same.

  12. I really want to recreate the portrait and name it “totally not Gina”

  13. Ooooh, I know what I’m gonna go take photos of tomorrow after I vote.

  14. If I had a billion dollars it would take quite a bit more to upset me.

  15. Stacks more money than sense. Why not just quietly offer to buy it (and then destroy it after it gets forgotten)?

  17. It’s not her portrait. It’s a portrait of her. This is a critical difference. She can “demand” whatever she wants as a vocal member of the public engaging in discourse over art. She has no legal basis to actually enforce any sort of action.

  18. It’s not her portrait. It’s a portrait of her. This is a critical difference. She can “demand” whatever she wants as a vocal member of the public engaging in discourse over art. She has no legal basis to actually enforce any sort of action.

  19. Am I the only one who thinks she has every right to make this demand?

  24. He’s getting way too much attention for being a really bad artist

  25. You gotta lean into shit like this man, you can’t fight it.

  29. You should really have the right to your own self image. If you want to write about someone, go ahead, but you shouldn’t be able to use people’s image without their permission, in most cases, unless the person is doing something criminal or something, and you need to prove to the public that it’s really them. It’s virtually always just a harassment or grifting technique and it’s very mean.

    In most cases, people should not just be allowed to use your image without your permission.

  30. Aw now she’s going to see a bunch more of them pop up all over the place

  32. It’s funny because had she not made a big deal out of this, it’s very likely the majority of the world wouldn’t even know it existed. But, alas, now we’ve all seen it.

  33. Because of her protests so many more people have seen this painting now. Good work!

  34. The artist is amazing.

    He really nailed Aussie Karen to a T, right down to her impetuous double chin!

    Good work sir.

  35. She should have just bought it then had it removed.

  36. Sounds like Gina Rinehart should climb Fuck Off, Cunt Mountain and shove the summit up her ass.

  37. Great plan on her part. Now the entire world has seen this picture that probably wouldn’t have had any traction before.

  41. When you google her, it does show this photo in the images tab.

  42. She is awakening to the reality of her legacy. She will be loathed not admired by an overwhelming majority of her fellow beings because of her values, choices, and prerogatives in life. Being as wealthy as she is has become recognized as a sign of pathology and not success as a human being living in harmony as a part of Earth.

  43. From what I have read, albeit early today and have not heard different.. but Swimming Australia has actually asked the portrait be removed. Rinehart donates to the association and they say it puts her in a bad light. This is farcical as a portrait of her will not change most people’s opinion of her anyway… but it seems it’s not Rinehart demanding but Swimming Australia asking.

Leave a Reply