And people wonder why no one wants them in there communities.
I know I’m making an assumption here but we should not have asylum seekers or IPAs “of no fixed abode”. Nor should we have them in tents by the canal. There should be a condition that for your asylum to be considered, you must reside in a fixed location or one provided by the state. I don’t think anyone could really consider that an unfair demand.
Either we are letting mental people in or the system is turning people mental.
Whatever your beliefs or views this isn’t working and it’s just another pile of shit from the government for hard working corporations who get up in the morning.
This is a case where yeah they should just go and send him back. I’ve no time for the scumbag ‘concerned citizens’, but if someone comes here and attacks someone fuck them.
[removed]
How can he be a flight risk if he has no documentation.
There is no state accommodation available for them. The ‘fixed location’ is the Grand Canal tent city that the government keeps tearing up.
Homeless services won’t deal with them either.
“The court heard he did not provide an address and had no valid form of ID other than a card given to him with a date of birth”
Ireland is not a serious country
Another fine addition to our country. This is what happens when you let anyone in.
The restrictions imposed by legal migration prevents a lot of these scumbags from stepping foot here.
But now with the asylum system anyone can enter with no documents or proof or who they are and are just let roam the streets.
And people wonder why there’s a rise in the far right…. Insane.
Will he be deported?
Have the government considered putting fences around women?
As we all know, fences are a tried and tested solution in this country. It can solve any problem.
12 comments
Ya may slap a culchie club tag on this one
And people wonder why no one wants them in there communities.
I know I’m making an assumption here but we should not have asylum seekers or IPAs “of no fixed abode”. Nor should we have them in tents by the canal. There should be a condition that for your asylum to be considered, you must reside in a fixed location or one provided by the state. I don’t think anyone could really consider that an unfair demand.
Either we are letting mental people in or the system is turning people mental.
Whatever your beliefs or views this isn’t working and it’s just another pile of shit from the government for hard working corporations who get up in the morning.
This is a case where yeah they should just go and send him back. I’ve no time for the scumbag ‘concerned citizens’, but if someone comes here and attacks someone fuck them.
[removed]
How can he be a flight risk if he has no documentation.
There is no state accommodation available for them. The ‘fixed location’ is the Grand Canal tent city that the government keeps tearing up.
Homeless services won’t deal with them either.
“The court heard he did not provide an address and had no valid form of ID other than a card given to him with a date of birth”
Ireland is not a serious country
Another fine addition to our country. This is what happens when you let anyone in.
The restrictions imposed by legal migration prevents a lot of these scumbags from stepping foot here.
But now with the asylum system anyone can enter with no documents or proof or who they are and are just let roam the streets.
And people wonder why there’s a rise in the far right…. Insane.
Will he be deported?
Have the government considered putting fences around women?
As we all know, fences are a tried and tested solution in this country. It can solve any problem.