Literally a population map. Very interesting. Russia, Scandinavia, Greece and Turkey seem pretty empty. The Spanish coast is highly populated in comparison with its interior land.
Again this dumb map. There are 1007 towns in slovakia with population higer than 1000. Please delete this post.
I’m surprised there aren’t more towns on the coast of the Caspian.
Nice outline of the Carpathians
Egypt has 100+ million people
99% of them live in those dots along the Nile
Let that sink in
If the weather wasn’t so terrible, I’d move to northern Norway. But then the area would probably not be so empty of people…
Oh boy, I live in the centre of the centre.
I live in one of the 20 northernmost dots, It’s nice and empty up here.
That Romanian moon shape always looks so cursed to me.
I appreciate the fact that Ireland is on the periphery of Europe. Not too crowded but still a nice standard of living and easy access to major European cities within hours.
Can anyone here actually name a city with a population of only 1000/2000? Lol I know there’s none in the UK
Wtf is up in Romania
Explains why western Europeans struggle to own a home nowadays
The Danish part of the map shows municipalities, but that is misleading, because each municipality may include several towns.
What is going on in France? i can understand other places but what ia France doing
Something is definitely wrong here. It is kinda hard to believe this map is correct when you look at Slovakia or Belarus.
Mecklenburg-Vorpommern is denser than Brandenburg?
Germany said. WE GOING RED
As Scandinavian, one small pleasure we have is that even though we are relatively small, the way maps are projected we look towering and dominant in maps of Europe.
We’ll take it!
Funny how you can see entire outline of Slovakia, among all the important mountain ranges.
Which one is the most red
Western Europeans live like ants.
You can see Poland’s pre-war border if you look hard enough
repost with the same misleading things, like northern germany wold seem densely populated according to this but its just muncipalities of several smaller towns
this map is meaningless. E.g. in Slovakia city is status and doesn’t mean size. So some villages can have more people then cities.
If its above 1000 just include all places above that number, if you remove all those villages/small towns above 1000 (without city status) what’s the point of this map? Since city/town status criteria is different in every country, for example in Croatia even small places have city status while in Serbia not even towns of 20,000 have it. I can see that In Serbia many places above 1000 are not included here.
33 comments
Source: https://earthlymission.com/european-cities-urbanization-map/
Scandinavia is fucking empty lol
Doitschlaaaand, Doitschlaaand!
Pretty cool how you can basically see the flat lands in red and mountainous regions in white.
[Topography of Europe](https://mapscaping.com/blogs/geo-candy/the-topography-of-europe)
Why the downvote?
Literally a population map. Very interesting. Russia, Scandinavia, Greece and Turkey seem pretty empty. The Spanish coast is highly populated in comparison with its interior land.
Again this dumb map. There are 1007 towns in slovakia with population higer than 1000. Please delete this post.
I’m surprised there aren’t more towns on the coast of the Caspian.
Nice outline of the Carpathians
Egypt has 100+ million people
99% of them live in those dots along the Nile
Let that sink in
If the weather wasn’t so terrible, I’d move to northern Norway. But then the area would probably not be so empty of people…
Oh boy, I live in the centre of the centre.
I live in one of the 20 northernmost dots, It’s nice and empty up here.
That Romanian moon shape always looks so cursed to me.
I appreciate the fact that Ireland is on the periphery of Europe. Not too crowded but still a nice standard of living and easy access to major European cities within hours.
Can anyone here actually name a city with a population of only 1000/2000? Lol I know there’s none in the UK
Wtf is up in Romania
Explains why western Europeans struggle to own a home nowadays
The Danish part of the map shows municipalities, but that is misleading, because each municipality may include several towns.
What is going on in France? i can understand other places but what ia France doing
Something is definitely wrong here. It is kinda hard to believe this map is correct when you look at Slovakia or Belarus.
Mecklenburg-Vorpommern is denser than Brandenburg?
Germany said. WE GOING RED
As Scandinavian, one small pleasure we have is that even though we are relatively small, the way maps are projected we look towering and dominant in maps of Europe.
We’ll take it!
Funny how you can see entire outline of Slovakia, among all the important mountain ranges.
Which one is the most red
Western Europeans live like ants.
You can see Poland’s pre-war border if you look hard enough
repost with the same misleading things, like northern germany wold seem densely populated according to this but its just muncipalities of several smaller towns
this map is meaningless. E.g. in Slovakia city is status and doesn’t mean size. So some villages can have more people then cities.
WW1 Romania borders are packed
Widać zabory.
Here is a previous discussion of errors in map.
https://www.reddit.com/r/MapPorn/comments/3tjl1t/cities_and_towns_in_europe_over_1000_inhabitants/
If its above 1000 just include all places above that number, if you remove all those villages/small towns above 1000 (without city status) what’s the point of this map? Since city/town status criteria is different in every country, for example in Croatia even small places have city status while in Serbia not even towns of 20,000 have it. I can see that In Serbia many places above 1000 are not included here.