Biden’s permission to strike targets in Russia does not apply to ATACMS , — White House

by Ok_Paramedic_3422

31 comments
  1. Jesus H. Christ, I think by this stage they can trust Ukraine to only strike military targets with their weaponry! On a more positive note, Ukrainian soldiers are now cleared to throw US ‘nades in the general direction of Ruzzia proper.

  2. That decision needs to be revised.

    u/Ok_Paramedic_3422: Could you kindly provide an official source for this statement?

  3. ukrain can do the same amount of damege to russia, as russia has done to ukrain end of story

  4. Fine. Scholz can deliver Taurus and we are fine …

  5. Source? Why just post a random picture?

    I have not seen any statement saying no ATACMs.

  6. On brand for this administration, and all the nsc and fp folks that can from Obama’s team, they did nothing but mouth breathe in 2014, but at least after two years of all out war, they start using half-truths from the state dept podium saying they gave Ukraine permission to strike when in reality there was a shit ton of red tape attached.

  7. Why in God’s name not? This will have to change, of course.This is like holding a tiger on a leash.

  8. You’ll get the driver’s license, but you’re only allowed to drive from your garage to the street curb outside.

  9. These should be allowed to hit military targets.

  10. The US is one of two countries left showing fear to Russia. The other is Italy.
    The US is pandering to Russia, showing fear and it’s pathetic. Absolutely pathetic.
    I expected more of the US. Disappointed beyond belief.
    If the US wouldn’t place such restrictions on itself in a time of war, it should not place those restrictions on others.

  11. Damn these M777s can shoot big rounds such a long way! It’s almost like they are guided missiles 🤔

  12. So, there is a list that US made what weapons it applies to? Mr. Jake Sullivan, please clarify what do you allow Ukraine to use in order to hit Russia with? I know oil depos and refineries are not allowed, F16 are not allowed. What is allowed, you kunt?

  13. No shots may be fired during the breeding season of birds either.

  14. they’ll use the ATACMS regardless so the title of this post is false.

  15. at least its a start. Everything and anything that help’s Ukraine i am happy with.

  16. As we have seen over the last 2 years this is likely to change.

  17. Is the US affraid of ruzzia? Come on, what’s coming is inevitable, just fucking do it!

  18. Did the US send Ukraine both types or only cluster ATACMS? Clusters do have a higher risk of civilian casualties.

  19. Guess that’s why there is so many fires in Chrimea. I’m not happy with holding back Ukraine like this.

  20. Biden needs to realize how bad things can get if Trump gets in and ends funding to Ukraine. Russia winning will trace directly back to Biden and the way he’s slow walking this. Isn’t it enough that someone else is taking out your #1 historical enemy for you?

  21. How fuking clownish can you get with clearance for strikes one day and in another actually backing up basically the whole permit as ATACMS is the main weapon for such strikes.

    First some F-16 bullshiet, recently Patriot use bullshiet and now this, fucking decide if you want them to use it and win or not,

    Politicians should be separated from military asap, those retards cant decide shiit

  22. This clown is making the US look weak on the daily…

  23. Biden is a HEYUGE pussy…. What ever happened to America’s anti Russia stance…. I’m so ashamed of my government to be honest…

    The answer… Money… That’s what happened….

  24. Biden has never really been known to have a backbone when it comes to conflicts. Draft Dodger, Afghanistan, etc, etc, etc

  25. I mean not surprising.
    His old boss also refused to send lethal aid to Ukraine.
    And kept drawing “lines in the sand” everywhere else while doing nothing when they get crossed.

Leave a Reply