I would say the new one is a better logo, but there’s just something about the old one. If you know, you know
I’d like us to use the old one for some things but the new one is the way to go. The original badge, but modern and clean. I’ll never forget the battle eagle though.
Never really liked the eagle. Also the 3 decorative stars on the top which didn’t represent anything title-related were kind of silly.
I like both, but the new one is pretty boss.
As a fan from 2010 to now, the eagle is nostalgic but city had a crest similar to what we have now from 1960s to 1997. I like the “new” crest better.
I would combine the new logo but add the
Pride in Battle motto
Wow i like the wavy/oceany background! Both imo are great. New logo new generation etc
7 comments
I would say the new one is a better logo, but there’s just something about the old one. If you know, you know
I’d like us to use the old one for some things but the new one is the way to go. The original badge, but modern and clean. I’ll never forget the battle eagle though.
Never really liked the eagle. Also the 3 decorative stars on the top which didn’t represent anything title-related were kind of silly.
I like both, but the new one is pretty boss.
As a fan from 2010 to now, the eagle is nostalgic but city had a crest similar to what we have now from 1960s to 1997. I like the “new” crest better.
I would combine the new logo but add the
Pride in Battle motto
Wow i like the wavy/oceany background! Both imo are great. New logo new generation etc