So I just watched the ‘big debate’ and couldn’t understand why VTM allowed two ladies I never heard of to comment on the ‘performance’ of each candidate/party. Did our political landscape somehow change to some sort of ‘voice of flanders’ or ‘cafe de mol’? Does VTM really need to steer their viewers’ opinion by providing one for them or are they just used to programs needing a judge?
Ffs, I can’t be the only one noticing this kind of framing!
by Sprengo_M
8 comments
It is just framing.
Weak political analysis. Waste of time to hear their recap.
Isolde Van Den Eynde may honestly be the least-informed, braindead, nepobaby ass fucking journalist I’ve ever seen being propped up. It’s not even that she preaches the most hollow ass right-wing POV’s imaginable, but her reasoning never makes any sense and once she starts talking legal matters, it’s literally always been completely off mark.
Terrible terrible terrible journalist.
I saw the thumbnail of this photo and was like wait is that Britney Spears?? 😂
Vox populi
You just started to noticing now…?
Voor hun rollende R
