
Alito’s Wife Caught on Tape Spewing Venom at Everyone
https://newrepublic.com/post/182554/alito-wife-caught-tape-pride-media-left-flag

Alito’s Wife Caught on Tape Spewing Venom at Everyone
https://newrepublic.com/post/182554/alito-wife-caught-tape-pride-media-left-flag
44 comments
We were spitting venom
At most everyone we know
If the damned gave us a road map
Then we’d know where just to go
Ope, so close to the modest mouse song lyrics
And nothing will happen
~~Leviticus~~ Jesus H: “Love thy neighbor as thy self.”
American “Christians”: “Hate everyone who isn’t like me? Got it!”
Justice Alito is not responsible for the toxins his wife spews at virtuslly every occasion. He is, however, for his biased attitudes, his corruption, his contempt for the Constitution and his total lack of understanding for the job of SC justice.
Edit: spelling
>“The other thing the femnazis believe, that he should control me,” Alito said about her husband.
Yes, one of the core tenets of radical feminism is that husbands should control their wives. It’s quite oblivious*.
That whole thing reads like she is drunk or just off her fucking rocker.
Edit: I meant “obvious” of course, but I’m going to leave it like this. 😆
Full interview with her on CNN has her caption as “Liberal activist who secretly recorded justices” like they might as well add a bullseye on her with all these crazy MAGA fucks..
> “You know what I want? I want a Sacred Heart of Jesus flag because I have to look across the lagoon at the Pride flag for the next month,” she said.
Premeditated hatred.
These people who only want Jesus occasionally (Easter, Christmas and Pride Month in this case) are posers, simple as that.
If this was any other job, he would have been fired by now. Yes, I know that Alito isn’t responsible for his wife being a terrible person, but I don’t see how Alito can keep his job given how antithetical his views are to America.
As an outside observer, I find it hard to believe that people like Alito aren’t held to account for the things they say, do and believe.
Ironically, doesn’t this show that Alito was telling the ‘truth’ about his wife ‘having an affinity for flags’ bit? She legit seems obsessed with flags.
Edit: To be clear, this is only a “that’s funny haw haw” comment and is not a defense of either.
The name of the grossest sex tape I’ve ever heard of
She seems…nice
Who could have thought a vile disgusting man would find a woman just as vile and disgusting as himself.
Claims to be Catholic, but never learned a thing about Jesus.
These moron, conservatives like they just landed on earth, just now figuring out that others exist and how things work.
She really is a reprehensible harpy.
“That’s how I satisfy myself.” Well, obviously Sam can’t get the job done.
She and Sam really deserve each other.
Sam, it’s easy:
Either you agree with her and need to be impeached immediately. And frankly, that seems like the case….
or..
You can retire to prove that you would refuse to let her biases affect your performance as the literal head of the Supreme Court.
Gonna go ahead and say your ego won’t let either happen.
She sounds like a strong front runner for vp
Guess she thinks this will work for plausible deniability: “Look at me, look at me. I’m German, from Germany. My heritage is German. You come after me. I’m gonna give it back to you. And there will be a way, it doesn’t have to be now, but there will be a way they will know. Don’t worry about it,” she said.
Alito having a batshit crazy wife is one of the least surprising things I’ve learned today.
What do you expect?
They worship via a symbol of torture and death from antiquity.
Term limit SCOTUS. 12 years max. And no grandfathering present members.
Giant piece of hateful shit is married to another giant piece of hateful shit.
I, for one, am shocked.
Ginny and Martha. Charming SC wives.
It real feels like someone had a file on this guy and now they’re releasing it. Why are we learning about the flag he flew in 2020 only now, 4 years later? Same thing happened to Madison Cawthorn
Well, isn’t she a charmer.
Omg literally? Thats crazy
Bet she and Ginni Thomas are fun at parties.
Jesus…..
Term limits on all justices…
This shit has got to end..
What despicable people. I feel like I need a shower just reading the venom spewed.
I find it funny how easy it is to get these people to just say this shit but also terrifying because they clearly don’t care about consequences or otherwise.
Ooh that’s why those neighbors don’t like you! Thanks for proving their point
The Alitos want “Godliness” but they lack mercy, humility, empathy and grace.
These f’ing people are the EPITOME of this essay: [“The Distress of the Privileged”](https://weeklysift.com/2012/09/10/the-distress-of-the-privileged/)
These people’s lives and minds are so small. The entire world at their fingertips with the power, money, and connections to create unprecedented change, but the best they can manage is some bitchy screeds about pride flags and mannequins at Target. I’m glad to know that me living my best life as a gay man causes this woman such distress. 🤷♂️
Ahh yes hate. A core value of the American conservative.
Sounds like a miserable existence to live. Imagine having such a privileged life and yet being so unhappy. A gilded cage of her own making.
I loved “I’m from Germany.” That lady was born in Kentucky.
Holy shit why do these people hate everyone and why are they leading our country?!
I’m guessing she and Ginny Thomas are quite close. What’s with SC justices having whackadoodle wives? Sheesh!
Imagine being that rich and secure and spending your day having petty fights with your neighbors about flags. Lady, why don’t you just take the boat out or go volunteer at a soup kitchen or something?
There’s nothing more Christ-like than hating everyone and wanting to get even.
Fucking morons.
This episode brings up some interesting questions, namely, is there a point at which a spouse is so bigoted that the non-bigoted spouse is tainted to such a degree that their continued public service is not tenable?
What I find so interesting about Martha-Ann’s statements is that she isn’t just religiously-opposed to homosexuality – she actually literally hates gay people and desperately wants them to know how much she hates them. Is there a point at which her bigotry makes Justice Alito’s continued service on the court improper? If these recordings are not enough, what would be? If she was putting on a Nazi uniform and goose-stepping down First Street in front of the Court while carrying a giant swastika flag – would that be a bridge too far? If a sitting justice’s spouse is so bigoted against such a large number of Americans (there are literally tens of millions of Americans who identify as LGBTQ), does the justice’s continued presence on the court constitute “bad behavior” even if he does not share those views?
Another way of reframing this question is to ask whether there is any point at which Americans are entitled to a court made up of justices who do not openly and intimately associate with bigots. Justice Alito’s position appears to be that his wife has a First Amendment right to express whatever bigoted views she holds however she wishes to express those views, and if that damages the Court, so be it. In other words, Justice Alito sees *his* justiceship as a property right that he can maintain for his own benefit, regardless of what the consequences are to the institution of the Court or the rule of law itself.
Article III of the U.S. Constitution is ambiguously worded, but it does *not* say that justices hold office for life regardless of how their voluntary acts and associations damage the Court. In fact, Article III merely says that justices hold their office during “good behavior”, without defining what good behavior actually is.
Is associating with bigots and flying flags of bigotry in front of their personal homes “good behavior”? If it damages the institution and reflects badly on the entire court, isn’t the act “bad behavior” regardless of whether it is entirely lawful? If the Founders intended a justice to serve unless impeached and convicted of “high crimes or misdemeanors”, why does Article III not say that? Why the (arguably) broader language referring to “good behavior”? Could it be that the Founders anticipated that Congress would require the justices to adhere to an ethical standard that is something more than “not breaking laws”? And if the Founders so intended that, is it unreasonable to ask the justices to resign from the court if their immediate family members voluntary acts harm the court? Isn’t failing to resign it’s own form of “bad behavior”?
So first she says:
“The other thing the femnazis believe, that he should control me,” Alito said about her husband. “So, they’ll go to hell. He never controls me.”
But later:
“And he’s like, ‘Oh please, don’t put up a flag.’ I said, ‘I won’t do it because I’m deferring to you.”
Make up your damn mind!