Statistical Comparison Between Zirkzee & CDK Last Season

by whosyadankey

16 comments
  1. Please don’t use this site as some type of justification to make any points to a players ability, again football is not played on a calculator,if u watch both play one is far more technical,better hold up play and better in decision making but hey I digress

  2. Statistics like these can be used for some players but Zirkzee is not that type. His roll as a facilitator is not recorded in numbers like this, and that is the roll that he is best at. Also generally, “per game” statistics are not informative when the two players play significantly different minutes per game. 

  3. Nice try Gerry. Now just pay the money only morons defend a billion company who won’t offer 15m to close a deal. The cash must flow or the water STINKS

  4. CDK played 7 minutes less this season, 25 g/a . zirkzee 19

  5. People don’t watch football it appears..they just look at the stats after the game is done.

  6. Maldini was right. Redbird fucked us… Bring our leyend back!

  7. Sofascore ratings don’t show the full picture, a player can have a stinker but get an assist and have high rating.

  8. Why couldn’t we go for Gasperini? Yes these players both play the same style and idk why we’re so frantic about one and so low on the other. CDK would have been a great player if we gave him time.

    Coming in last 3 minutes of a match when he can’t even get a touch wasn’t setting him to succeeded.

  9. i dont buy into these stats for same reasons others have mentioned.but who would you say had the better season?

  10. So we are getting a worse CDK , don’t kid me this is who we are hyping up . Redturd is actually clueless in the football world.

  11. The only thing to take from this is that cdk plays like he’s 192cm. Zirkzee plays like he’s 1.68

Leave a Reply