Justice Alito’s Views On Social Media And The First Amendment Seem To Shift Depending On Who He Wants To Win

https://abovethelaw.com/2024/07/justice-alitos-views-on-social-media-and-the-first-amendment-seem-to-shift-depending-on-who-he-wants-to-win/

42 comments

  1. Because he is a two faced rat fuck. He needs to be impeached or for Biden to test out those new above the law powers.

  3. Never thought as a kid learning civics in middle school that I would get to watch democracy die my lifetime

  7. At the end of the day Alito is damaged from all the years he was marginalized as the far right wacko wing of the court, and he’s a hack. Put those two together and you have a whole lot of unhinged.

  11. Of course they do. Alito is less of a Justice and more of a tool for white nationalist autocracy. Fuck him

  14. > *Seem To*

     

    For fucks sake everyone… they don’t believe in the rule of law. To conservatives, the law is whatever they say, when they say it, and only applies to who they say.

  15. This clown is on tape saying no one is above the law. But he made a dumbass choice to prove he doesn’t mean what he says. Of course he will rule for whoever pays him the most.

  16. This is the most corrupt court in the nation’s history. Disgusting animals and threat to national security.

  17. I really think SCOTUS needs to be expanded. And not by just a few seats, it needs be dozens or hundreds of seats. And its rulings should not be absolute.

  21. According to Alito, Biden can remove corrupt judges from SCOTUS as an official act any time he wants to and he’d be immune from any ramifications — since the Dems would block impeachment and he couldn’t be charged by the DoJ.

  23. Remember those statues outside courthouses of a woman holding a scale while blindfolded?

    That’s an artistic representation of what American ideals of justice mean. Justice is blind and it weighs both sides equally.

    This Supreme Court has removed the blindfold, tossed away the scales entirely, and picked up a gun that they aim persistently at all political enemies and holster for their political allies.

  25. These people think they’re Jesus’ chosen ones. it doesn’t matter that they’re complete losers in their earthly life. They’ll do whatever is best for their tribe, period. Hypocrisy has no meaning to them. They have no shame. They’re the Christian Taliban. Thomas is calling Jack Smith’s investigation unconstitutional but he had no problem when Ken Starr was investigating Clinton.

  28. His views on literally everything shift depending on who he wants to win.

    I’d say he’s post-truth but i don’t even think he has a philosophy other than “I’m gonna get paid and fuck you all.”

    A used condom would make a better judge.

  29. Cats out the bag. If you’re continuing to give conservatives the benefit of the doubt, it’s on you at this point. That goes for the peasantry and those in power.

  31. Yes. He promised not to over turn decided law too. I think he might be a liar.

  32. That’s because Injustice Alito is interested in “owning the libs” and nothing more.

  33. Justice Alito’s Views ~~On Social Media And The First Amendment Seem To~~ Shift Depending On Who He Wants To Win

    ftfy

  34. Biden “official” act as President; remove Alito, Thomas and Kavanaugh.

  35. These people have to go. There is no longer trust in our Supreme Court.

  37. I hate that he gets the title Justice Alito. Nothing just about him- or Clarence for that matter.

  38. If this guy was an umpire angel hernandez would be calling for his termination.

  39. Treasonous fascist dark triad personality cult

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_triad

    [alito](https://www.reddit.com/r/scotus/s/bvoFz42VK0)

    [roberts](https://www.reddit.com/r/scotus/s/vsJzyOLgE6)

    [Barret](https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4928554/user-clip-judge-amy-coney-barrett-views)

    All 3 saying that the president isn’t above the law under oath 20 years ago.

    [I’m creating a substack with entire book outlines exposing Steve bannon, Trump, putin and russia](https://elonsson.substack.com/)

  41. > He claims that perhaps the sites could be considered common carriers (which only makes sense if you don’t understand what a common carrier is).

    He’s either pretending not to know, or he actually doesn’t know and is just throwing on some random internet-related term that has been in public discourse pretty often in the last decade or so.

    Either it’s a bad faith argument or he’s a fucking idiot and shouldn’t be saying shit.

  42. Thats their opinion on anything , red shits on the constitution, dem say hey you can’t do that. Will call foul and make up some part space jam movie says yes the red can indeed shit on the constitution and the dems fault.

Leave a Reply