They’ve even replaced the Queen herself with an imposter. Top quality items all round.
Good old AliExpress. From the same place that brought you Oaley sunglasses and Doopside deck shoes.
Chinese tat makers can’t even make souvenir tat properly. Who buys this tat?
Why do we ship tat halfway round the world? When will we stop making stuff that no one wants or needs?
Never mind the misprint, wtf did they do to the queen’s face?
Lovely jubbly!
Should have got Rodders with his GCEs to do the order instead of Del Boy.
There’s a CGI-looking crown viewed at an angle, over a flat / bevelled shape, with a horse and lion that are thickly outlined, and then a horrendous image of the Queen which is randomly outlined and looks like it was done in MS Paint. She looks like some crazed vampire or demon. The whole lot of it feels like those shirt adverts from Facebook “Queens born in APRIL have the best SENSE OF HUMOUR, aMaZiNg WeAlTh, and nonces for kids”
Jubbly is hilarious though.
I don’t understand how that sort of misprint happens. Surely whatever they’re copying has the correct spelling. It’s like the people who write scam emails that are meant to be from a company but have obvious errors, when they could have just copied/pasted the actual legitimate text.
13 comments
They’ve even replaced the Queen herself with an imposter. Top quality items all round.
Good old AliExpress. From the same place that brought you Oaley sunglasses and Doopside deck shoes.
Chinese tat makers can’t even make souvenir tat properly. Who buys this tat?
Why do we ship tat halfway round the world? When will we stop making stuff that no one wants or needs?
Never mind the misprint, wtf did they do to the queen’s face?
Lovely jubbly!
Should have got Rodders with his GCEs to do the order instead of Del Boy.
I used the crown earlier [today in a lazy design too.](https://stock.adobe.com/181735000?as_campaign=TinEye&as_content=tineye_match&epi1=181735000&tduid=8ddfdb635326b4cb4ccf13d7e9fbfbf2&as_channel=affiliate&as_campclass=redirect&as_source=arvato). This design is a good example of how hard it can be to match styles when you’re just collating cheap graphics.
[Here’s the lion.](https://www.alamy.com/heraldic-lions-with-shield-and-ribbon-emblem-or-badge-template-heraldic-and-crest-medieval-royal-logo-vector-illustration-image414469295.html)
[Here’s the horse](https://www.shutterstock.com/image-vector/coat-arms-logo-template-unicorns-shield-286008341)
The Queen is just live [trace of this image](https://rlv.zcache.com/queen_elizabeth_photo_print-rbf2cd9591d1646e5b00c66e0e04f0ead_fk99_8byvr_307.jpg) and they have removed some of her hair/crown. Heathens.
Honestly the spelling mistake is the best bit.
There’s a CGI-looking crown viewed at an angle, over a flat / bevelled shape, with a horse and lion that are thickly outlined, and then a horrendous image of the Queen which is randomly outlined and looks like it was done in MS Paint. She looks like some crazed vampire or demon. The whole lot of it feels like those shirt adverts from Facebook “Queens born in APRIL have the best SENSE OF HUMOUR, aMaZiNg WeAlTh, and nonces for kids”
Jubbly is hilarious though.
I don’t understand how that sort of misprint happens. Surely whatever they’re copying has the correct spelling. It’s like the people who write scam emails that are meant to be from a company but have obvious errors, when they could have just copied/pasted the actual legitimate text.
Clearly this guys got mates in the media and they help him shift his stock as hes selling 1000 (90% off discount) plates for £32k, the other christmas he bought a load of jumpers with knobs on them ‘by accident’ too. https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/17005999/businessman-stuck-christmas-jumpers?utm_source=native_share&utm_medium=sharebar_native&utm_campaign=sharebaramp
Well Rodders, Looks like we’ve go another T.I.T. Classic!
I don’t understand why we’re celebrating the fact the Queen’s got platinum jubblies.
Must be pretty rare, I’ve only seen the orange ones in the shops
Isn’t that just a pretty transparent way of trying to make god awful royalist tat more valuable?
The ‘article’ might as well be an advertorial… BBC do this a lot which is troubling, they should have some ethical standards.