
Keir Starmer: Ukraine könnte mit britischen Raketen Angriffe innerhalb Russlands durchführen
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-07-10/starmer-says-ukraine-can-use-uk-missiles-to-strike-inside-russia

Keir Starmer: Ukraine könnte mit britischen Raketen Angriffe innerhalb Russlands durchführen
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-07-10/starmer-says-ukraine-can-use-uk-missiles-to-strike-inside-russia
19 comments
*From Bloomberg News reporter Alex Wickham:*
Keir Starmer signaled Ukraine can use Britain’s Storm Shadow missiles to strike military targets inside Russia, confirming he would continue the previous UK government’s policy on the use of its long-range weapons in the Russia-Ukraine war.
Starmer agreed it was up to Ukraine how it used the Storm Shadow missiles donated by the UK, when asked by a Bloomberg reporter. He was speaking to journalists while traveling to the NATO summit in Washington late Tuesday.
The missiles must “obviously to be used in accordance with international humanitarian law as you would expect,” the premier added, stating his position that Storm Shadows were to be used “for defensive purposes.”
kremlin has said it would be bad.
fuck the kremlin. strike away ukraine. russia deserves all the shit coming to them.
About damn time
What is the range on the storm shadow?
Excellent!
This is a strong signal that we in the UK will not bow down to threats from Putler.
Its really the world upside down post Obama lol.
The left is begging for more war while the right is putting their heels in the sand.
Its insane how trump said; if i lose we get war with russia. And hillary smiled through it knowing he was right.
Its crazy how hijacked the right wing is by russia nowadays.
Good. Strike now before he changes his mind.
> Keir Starmer signaled Ukraine can use Britain’s Storm Shadow missiles to strike military targets inside Russia, confirming he would continue the previous UK government’s policy on the use of its long-range weapons in the Russia-Ukraine war.
Headline should say “Ukraine can *continue using*”. But good news anyway.
Was this not the case before? I thought we had already allowed it , which caused putin to throw a hissy fit.
Still insane that it’s up to debate.
Russia can strike Ukrainian children with cancer at 6482918373902 km from the frontline like it’s coll and normal but god forbid Ukraine strike the Russian military in Russia, that’s a step to far guys
We are three years in and it’s always been ….oh we can’t allow Ukraine to have air support or we can’t allow Ukraine to attack inside Russia, that would only anger Putin and escalate the situation….well, Putin is bombing children’s hospitals and we tie Ukraine’s hands???? Enough. Give Ukraine what they need. The time is short, Trump wins and Ukraine falls…😕
We can expect Corbyn to protest …
God bless the united kingdom.
Its strange to me to think that if this was the 80’s, the rights hero Ronald Reagan would have boots on the ground to intimidate Russia in to backing off and poured money to fund Ukraine. But now the right is going more pro Russia and he would be in disbelief. The last 20 or so years of politics has been a wild ass ride.
Sir Keir been PM for a week and he’s straight away saying this, I love to see it.
Have we not got anything bigger and longer range that we can send?
Russia has no respect for diplomacy and weak hands, they only respect strength, they will only back down with forcefulness and a united front
The US as a whole needs to back off, Let Europe handle it. I’m really quite tired of this shit. America needs to pull from NATO for good and go back to being an isolationist nation, I’m sick of war.
Starm Shadows incoming!