State of the art means jack shit on the battlefield if used inappropiatley, these russian tank charges are absolute insanity, especially since the turret is a massive weakpoint on them.
And the turtle tank also didn’t work? 🤣
Well….”state of the ruzzian art” anyway…..
According to western analysts, RuZ can produce about 80 T-90 per year.
The state of their tanks is now becoming an art! Wonderful!
State of the art is with a compensation cage, right?
How high did the turret go?
Remember when we made a big deal of the first T-90M destroyed? Now it’s just normal
Wow!! That’s great news!! 👏👏
State of the shart more like
How rush propaganda would spin this.
Well, that’s nothing. Russia has destroyed 75 HIMARS systems and shot down 26 F-16’s nana, nana foo foo.
Anal og owned
Meanwhile they are celebrating and coping with the fact they took out about 10 M1A1’s. Likely the least capable Abrams variant around which have been stripped of their DU armour inserts, no CITV, downgraded export armour, with inadequate counter-UAV, air defence, inadequate armour support and forced to fight with doctrines that the Abrams was never designed for.
To say nothing of the fact most were damaged or destroyed by either powerful ATGM’s that would make a mess of just about any MBT with strikes to the rear or flanks, or struck and disabled in place by FPV drones.
Oh, and unlike the Russians, the US never once claimed the Abrams to be some unstoppable, impossible to kill MBT, making themselves look like the usual coping idiot Russians.
Anniversaries are cute
The irony that the article is plastered with ads for the “#1 rated POS”
“State of the art” 😂😂😂
Actually relative to the rest of Russian shite, it probably is. Vs the rest of the word, it’s as “state of the art” as a 1970’s Lada… (released in 1996)
The art of suck
#MADSKILLZ
At the current rate, Russia will be almost totally out of tanks by 2026.
19 comments
State of the art means jack shit on the battlefield if used inappropiatley, these russian tank charges are absolute insanity, especially since the turret is a massive weakpoint on them.
And the turtle tank also didn’t work? 🤣
Well….”state of the ruzzian art” anyway…..
According to western analysts, RuZ can produce about 80 T-90 per year.
The state of their tanks is now becoming an art! Wonderful!
State of the art is with a compensation cage, right?
How high did the turret go?
Remember when we made a big deal of the first T-90M destroyed? Now it’s just normal
Wow!! That’s great news!! 👏👏
State of the shart more like
How rush propaganda would spin this.
Well, that’s nothing. Russia has destroyed 75 HIMARS systems and shot down 26 F-16’s nana, nana foo foo.
Anal og owned
Meanwhile they are celebrating and coping with the fact they took out about 10 M1A1’s. Likely the least capable Abrams variant around which have been stripped of their DU armour inserts, no CITV, downgraded export armour, with inadequate counter-UAV, air defence, inadequate armour support and forced to fight with doctrines that the Abrams was never designed for.
To say nothing of the fact most were damaged or destroyed by either powerful ATGM’s that would make a mess of just about any MBT with strikes to the rear or flanks, or struck and disabled in place by FPV drones.
Oh, and unlike the Russians, the US never once claimed the Abrams to be some unstoppable, impossible to kill MBT, making themselves look like the usual coping idiot Russians.
Anniversaries are cute
The irony that the article is plastered with ads for the “#1 rated POS”
“State of the art” 😂😂😂
Actually relative to the rest of Russian shite, it probably is. Vs the rest of the word, it’s as “state of the art” as a 1970’s Lada… (released in 1996)
The art of suck
#MADSKILLZ
At the current rate, Russia will be almost totally out of tanks by 2026.