> Gallo-Iberian
> Languages spoken just in France and Italy
IMO The Slavic and Indo-Iranian languages should come from one branch instead of two, just look at their similarities, Slavic languages have an obvious connection, for example 5 in Farsi is Penj and in Polish it’s Pięć(Pyenj).
> English
> no connection to French
Also the colouring is bad.
Gaelic nowadays generally implies just Scottish Gaelic, so that branch should also show Irish and Manx.
“European” isn’t its own branch like Indo-Iranian is, all of those branches sprouting from it are their own things.
Cant read pixels
No Semitic languages at all?
Old world? Old world includes North Africa, Middle East, India, China, and Central Asia…What about the languages that have been spoken those lands?
Uralic Languages do NOT have the same roots with Indo-European Languages. They came to Europe much more earlier than the first IE spread.
14 comments
There’s no source?
The term “connected” is used really vaguely here.
> Gallo-Iberian
> Languages spoken just in France and Italy
IMO The Slavic and Indo-Iranian languages should come from one branch instead of two, just look at their similarities, Slavic languages have an obvious connection, for example 5 in Farsi is Penj and in Polish it’s Pięć(Pyenj).
> English
> no connection to French
Also the colouring is bad.
Gaelic nowadays generally implies just Scottish Gaelic, so that branch should also show Irish and Manx.
“European” isn’t its own branch like Indo-Iranian is, all of those branches sprouting from it are their own things.
Cant read pixels
No Semitic languages at all?
Old world? Old world includes North Africa, Middle East, India, China, and Central Asia…What about the languages that have been spoken those lands?
Uralic Languages do NOT have the same roots with Indo-European Languages. They came to Europe much more earlier than the first IE spread.
It’s too JPEGed.
And Basque is again forgotten.
I can’t find python