Why do we accept the premise that “Switzerland is no longer in a period of peace?” by SimonSim211 Tags:switzerland 2 comments The TLDR of the article is: that shooting ranges need less work done to reduce sound pollution as we are no longer in a decade of peace. It has a dissenting opinion that that work is important, but not on the fact that we are no longer in a period of peace. Because some powerful people have high financial interest in fanning the flames. Leave a ReplyYou must be logged in to post a comment.
The TLDR of the article is: that shooting ranges need less work done to reduce sound pollution as we are no longer in a decade of peace. It has a dissenting opinion that that work is important, but not on the fact that we are no longer in a period of peace.
2 comments
The TLDR of the article is: that shooting ranges need less work done to reduce sound pollution as we are no longer in a decade of peace.
It has a dissenting opinion that that work is important, but not on the fact that we are no longer in a period of peace.
Because some powerful people have high financial interest in fanning the flames.