While acknowledging general differences between the sexes because obviously, to suggest either is superior or inferior is disharmonious with ethics of equality by default and an extremist position by virtue of suggesting one or the other deserves different protections and/or treatment.
I mean yeah, I’d like to be assured misandry will be too but extreme sexism should be treated the same as extremist racism. In general I think most ‘man, FUCK that demographic!’ stances should be treated like that.
[removed]
[removed]
good, now what about misandry
So people who believe that the testimony of a man is equal to that of 2 women as told in quran should be punished?
I wonder what kind of criteria you must fulfill to qualify as a misogynist.
Do you have to do misogynist deeds, texts, or tweets, or is it enough just to be a silent misogynist to get accepted?
Brits are crazy.
This is the best tl;dr I could make, [original](https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c15gn0lq7p5o) reduced by 79%. (I’m a bot)
*****
> Extreme misogyny will be treated as a form of extremism under new government plans, the Home Office has said.
> The review will look at the rise of Islamist and far-right extremism in the UK, as well as wider ideological trends, including extreme misogyny or beliefs which fit into broader categories, such as violence.
> Critics might argue that some reviews are a proxy for actual action, but Labour has pointed out that there has been no new Counter Extremism Strategy since 2015, and that an assessment of new and emerging threats is overdue.
ITT: people who conflate “freedom of speech” with “freedom from consequences”
Freedom of speech protects you when you criticise the government, not a free pass to be publicly racist or a bigot in other ways.
It’s so simple to grasp yet people keep failing.
Extreme Misogyny not just misogyny. I think being a mentally unwell Incel, murdering 5 people then yourself with a shotgun would qualify. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plymouth_shooting](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plymouth_shooting)
This is a counter terrorism review which hasn’t been done since 2015, Before the mass shooting in 2021 above and the rise of people like Andrew Tate and that special little group of cunts who follow him and his bullshit.
Any effective counter terrorism organisation would take a look at this type of extremism along with everything else.
It’s just common sense.
i bet ” tradition ” is overlooked if you catch my drift
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
Hilarious seeing all the comments saying “good we need to tackle Islamism” as if it’s some kind of gotcha… when the article specifically states that the review looking into how to counter misogyny will also look into Islamic extremism, amongst other things. But of course, these people can’t read, and even if they could they’re adept at ignoring things that don’t fit their narrative.
Women out here being the largest group of oppressed people in the world and men are out here like, what about misandry though?? Women would not be oppressed if it were not for men. Men are and have been historically, culturally, economically, religiously and socially the oppressors! You may not view yourself as misogynist, but to completely “yes and” the oppression of women to garner men’s legal protection is laughable. That proposes that we are all as human beings equally oppressed- we are not. To provide protections for women who are under a religion that values misogyny, but are now living in western countries, gives them rights they did not have in their former countries. It says, when you come here, you abide by our laws, not your religious laws. The laws in your country already started with men having these rights as a given- you had that protection from day one. Ridiculous comments in here.
Good. It should be. Some of the stuff people say is just insane.
Society constantly changes and what we deem acceptable does with it. This was gonna happen someday, and if implemented well will be a good thing! Good on yuh, UK!
Tolerance Paradox, we need more of this. Let’s stop tolerating hate and archaic inequality bullshit.
The US will never consider misogyny as extremist because misogyny is a feature of christianity, therefore godly.
23 comments
Seems legit.
While acknowledging general differences between the sexes because obviously, to suggest either is superior or inferior is disharmonious with ethics of equality by default and an extremist position by virtue of suggesting one or the other deserves different protections and/or treatment.
I mean yeah, I’d like to be assured misandry will be too but extreme sexism should be treated the same as extremist racism. In general I think most ‘man, FUCK that demographic!’ stances should be treated like that.
[removed]
[removed]
good, now what about misandry
So people who believe that the testimony of a man is equal to that of 2 women as told in quran should be punished?
I wonder what kind of criteria you must fulfill to qualify as a misogynist.
Do you have to do misogynist deeds, texts, or tweets, or is it enough just to be a silent misogynist to get accepted?
Brits are crazy.
This is the best tl;dr I could make, [original](https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c15gn0lq7p5o) reduced by 79%. (I’m a bot)
*****
> Extreme misogyny will be treated as a form of extremism under new government plans, the Home Office has said.
> The review will look at the rise of Islamist and far-right extremism in the UK, as well as wider ideological trends, including extreme misogyny or beliefs which fit into broader categories, such as violence.
> Critics might argue that some reviews are a proxy for actual action, but Labour has pointed out that there has been no new Counter Extremism Strategy since 2015, and that an assessment of new and emerging threats is overdue.
*****
[**Extended Summary**](http://np.reddit.com/r/autotldr/comments/1ew4lk6/misogyny_to_be_treated_as_terrorism/) | [FAQ](http://np.reddit.com/r/autotldr/comments/31b9fm/faq_autotldr_bot/ “Version 2.02, ~692571 tl;drs so far.”) | [Feedback](http://np.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%23autotldr “PM’s and comments are monitored, constructive feedback is welcome.”) | *Top* *keywords*: **review**^#1 **extremism**^#2 **new**^#3 **government**^#4 **strategy**^#5
[removed]
[removed]
Fantastic. This includes misandry right?
…right?
ITT: people who conflate “freedom of speech” with “freedom from consequences”
Freedom of speech protects you when you criticise the government, not a free pass to be publicly racist or a bigot in other ways.
It’s so simple to grasp yet people keep failing.
Extreme Misogyny not just misogyny. I think being a mentally unwell Incel, murdering 5 people then yourself with a shotgun would qualify. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plymouth_shooting](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plymouth_shooting)
This is a counter terrorism review which hasn’t been done since 2015, Before the mass shooting in 2021 above and the rise of people like Andrew Tate and that special little group of cunts who follow him and his bullshit.
Absolutely needs to be looked at. [https://www.theguardian.com/society/2022/oct/30/global-incel-culture-terrorism-misogyny-violent-action-forums](https://www.theguardian.com/society/2022/oct/30/global-incel-culture-terrorism-misogyny-violent-action-forums)
Any effective counter terrorism organisation would take a look at this type of extremism along with everything else.
It’s just common sense.
i bet ” tradition ” is overlooked if you catch my drift
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
Hilarious seeing all the comments saying “good we need to tackle Islamism” as if it’s some kind of gotcha… when the article specifically states that the review looking into how to counter misogyny will also look into Islamic extremism, amongst other things. But of course, these people can’t read, and even if they could they’re adept at ignoring things that don’t fit their narrative.
Women out here being the largest group of oppressed people in the world and men are out here like, what about misandry though?? Women would not be oppressed if it were not for men. Men are and have been historically, culturally, economically, religiously and socially the oppressors! You may not view yourself as misogynist, but to completely “yes and” the oppression of women to garner men’s legal protection is laughable. That proposes that we are all as human beings equally oppressed- we are not. To provide protections for women who are under a religion that values misogyny, but are now living in western countries, gives them rights they did not have in their former countries. It says, when you come here, you abide by our laws, not your religious laws. The laws in your country already started with men having these rights as a given- you had that protection from day one. Ridiculous comments in here.
Good. It should be. Some of the stuff people say is just insane.
Society constantly changes and what we deem acceptable does with it. This was gonna happen someday, and if implemented well will be a good thing! Good on yuh, UK!
Tolerance Paradox, we need more of this. Let’s stop tolerating hate and archaic inequality bullshit.
The US will never consider misogyny as extremist because misogyny is a feature of christianity, therefore godly.