I woud say that it is quite bad if they only need one unit to defend Kursk against multiple AFU units …
*”Guys…the kursk is already sunk. What do you prove ? You Can sink kursk a second Time ?”*
DPICM time
But Putin promised them to be gone October 1st!
Well, Ukraine sank most of the ships, so I guess they have to do something.
Russia’s Black Sea fleet is currently occupied with submarine duties, so it makes sense.
Well, for the past hundred-something years, the Russian Navy did just about three things: Drain money, get their arses handed over and serve as a backup supply of infantrymen.
I mean, even some of Moskva’s sailors were sent to Kherson after its last stop before its final voyage.
11 comments
That is because they dont have a navy to defend.
I woud say that it is quite bad if they only need one unit to defend Kursk against multiple AFU units …
*”Guys…the kursk is already sunk. What do you prove ? You Can sink kursk a second Time ?”*
DPICM time
But Putin promised them to be gone October 1st!
Well, Ukraine sank most of the ships, so I guess they have to do something.
Russia’s Black Sea fleet is currently occupied with submarine duties, so it makes sense.
Well, for the past hundred-something years, the Russian Navy did just about three things: Drain money, get their arses handed over and serve as a backup supply of infantrymen.
I mean, even some of Moskva’s sailors were sent to Kherson after its last stop before its final voyage.
That’s actually a pretty good unit.
If they surrender that’s going to be a big deal
Just another term for Marines, right?
Yes