Disney Drops Weird Disney+ Subscriber Agreement Clause in Wrongful Death Case

6 comments

1. They absolutely would have continued in court with this case had the press not picked up on it.

2. I still doubt they’re gonna pay anything since they don’t own or operate that restaurant. It would be ridiculous if any lawsuit against a restaurant for its food could be brought against the landlord for the establishment. It doesn’t make any sense.

3. They are claiming that it was still a valid thing to do. They have learned nothing.

4. “Weird”? Try “evil”

5. >“At Disney, we strive to put humanity above all other considerations. With such unique circumstances as the ones in this case, we believe this situation warrants a sensitive approach to expedite a resolution for the family who have experienced such a painful loss. As such, we’ve decided to waive our right to arbitration and have the matter proceed in court.”

   “Be warned. Just because we didn’t do it this time, it doesn’t mean that we won’t do it next time, so watch your ass.”

6. I feel like once upon a time something this insane would have gotten our government to do something but due to modern news cycles it’ll be forgotten in like a week