A temporary ban on the sale or supply of puberty blockers has been extended to cover Northern Ireland.

Puberty blockers work by suppressing the release of hormones and can be prescribed to children questioning their gender.

In May, the Conservative government tightened rules on the drugs, introducing an emergency ban on them being prescribed by private and European prescribers.

This ban, which has been renewed, will come into effect in Northern Ireland from 27 August.

BBC News NI understands the matter was dealt with by way of urgent procedure, with the order signed off by the first and deputy first ministers without wider executive approval.

'Hard deadline to meet'
In Northern Ireland, puberty blockers were only available on NHS prescription for under-18s, for those young people who were accepted and remain on the Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services Gender Identity Service endocrine pathway prior to March 2020.

It is understood children already on this medical pathway will continue to receive treatment.

Hormone suppressors also remain available for patients receiving the drugs for other uses, such as early-onset puberty.

The move to ban puberty blockers came after a report into children's gender services – the Cass Review – said there were "gaps in evidence" around the drugs.

The review was led by leading paediatrician Dr Hilary Cass and prompted the last government to ban the use of puberty blockers for under-18s questioning their gender – a move which was then supported by Labour when they won the election.

Westminster has now extended that temporary legislation, external, which previously did not include Northern Ireland.

Transgender youth support charity Mermaids said it is "very disappointed" by the decision to extend the ban to Northern Ireland as it "sets a worrying precedent".

Health Minister Mike Nesbitt said that he had “secured executive approval" to extend the temporary ban, pending agreement on "a long-term solution".

On the use of an urgent decision under the ministerial code, Mr Nesbitt told BBC's Talkback programme that he he had a "hard deadline" to meet which had "implications" for the entire UK.

Mr Nesbitt agreed the matter of puberty blockers "would be a valid point" to put on the agenda for the next meeting of the Northern Ireland Executive.

The minister added that he had shared a paper outlining the rationale for the decision, but he would not be drawn on whether any executive colleagues responded to this.

First Minister Michelle O'Neill said: "The health minister has taken forward a position based on medical advice, but clearly we have to have the appropriate support in place for anybody out there who requires gender affirming support."

Alexa Moore, from the Rainbow Project charity which supports LGBTQ+ people living in Northern Ireland, told BBC's Talkback that clinical decisions should be made in consultation with patients, not by politicians.

"I would really question why an urgent procedure was needed during a summer recess when the whole executive can't get around the table and fully and fruitfully discuss this," she said.

Ms Moore said gender identity services in Northern Ireland "are in complete disarray" and that is where urgency should be directed.

"This is clamping down on an area of care that virtually doesn’t exist and what avenues do exist to access that are being shut off," she added.

'Sensible decision'
DUP health spokesperson Diane Dodds said the decision to extend the ban was "a sensible decision based on expert medical opinion".

"Our position on the provision of puberty blockers has been clear and given the lack of long-term evidence of their safety it is right that the most cautious approach is taken," she said.

She added ensuring NI was included in the ban was "the most sensible outcome" and she is "glad that we have finally arrived at that destination".

People Before Profit MLA Gerry Carroll has called on the executive to roll back on the ban, adding such decisions "should not be based on opportunistic politicking".

“The health minister and his colleagues are pandering to the worst right wing sentiments to distract from their own failings," Mr Carroll added. “The Stormont executive should focus on fixing the health service instead of trying to scapegoat the trans community."

An Alliance party spokesperson said: "The well-being of young people and their families must be at the heart of our decision-making when we discuss this issue.

"The Cass Review did not review clinical services or pathways provided in Northern Ireland. Therefore, not all the recommendations may be applicable to services here.

"We await the outcome of the Gender Identity Service Pathway Review, commissioned by the Department of Health to review local services, which we anticipate will be better placed to inform future service provision."

In a statement, a Sinn Féin spokesperson said the party "accepts the current medical advice from the chief medical officer" and that they will monitor the British Medical Association's review of the Cass Report.

"To be clear, our position is that clinical and health care is best determined by doctors and clinicians – not politicians – and needs to be informed by the clinical and scientific evidence," the spokesperson added.

Green Party NI representative Ash Jones described the ban as "highly disappointing".

"Announcing it via X/Twitter is particularly insensitive for such an emotive topic," she said.

Ms Jones added that the ban is "another let down" by executive parties.

"They have promised an LGBTQ+ strategy since 2007," she said. "Last night, they have made things worse for trans people and their families.

"This is a betrayal by the executive, particularly by parties that march in Pride parades."

In a statement, the Department of Health said that, in light of the Cass Review, "and to close potential loopholes that could be exploited by not having a UK-wide legislative approach", Mr Nesbitt concluded that Northern Ireland should align with Great Britain.

It comes as the former boss of Mermaids, trans activist and director of Anne, Susie Green, said she planned to exploit a legal loophole in Northern Ireland, external to bring the drugs into Britain.

"Labour’s choice to remove NI as an option for families accessing puberty blockers simply increases the costs and inconvenience for patients who will now travel further afield, increasing the inequity," Ms Green told BBC News NI.

"This updated legislation was signed off without the full support of the Northern Ireland Executive, which raises additional concerns about its motivation and legitimacy," she added.

"We are deeply concerned about the motivations and callous lack of regard for how this will impact young people and their families… Politics has no place in medicine, and it is deeply shameful that this is happening."

BBC News NI has asked the Executive Office for a comment.

by figurine89

13 comments
  1. Last year Emma Sheerin called for legislation to ensure trans youths were able to access puberty blockers and this was backed by the party. Now they’ve backtracked and supported a ban.

  2. Please just leave these kinds of decisions to the doctors. Politicians shouldn’t be the ones making these decisions.

  3. Disgusting – and doesn’t bode well for any promises they make down south

  4. Which drugs go for the most profit in this field? Asking for an investor friend

  5. Are they planning to just use temporary “emergency” orders forever, so they never have to go through public consultations or legislative scrutiny?

  6. If we limited comments here to people with personal experience you’d find two groups; concerned parents grateful for this ruling because the NHS *exclusively* offers gender affirming counselling and treatment (so, for example, if you have an autistic 15 year old girl asking to transition, you can either do it or exit treatment. They have no concept of giving her therapy for a while to see if it’s actually appropriate, it’s all or nothing on the first appointment), and under-18s asking for puberty blockers with no medical context or guidance on whether that’s appropriate or helpful.

    Everything else is noise, including me, and including you.

  7. Fuck this shite, we need to get this emergency orders stopped, gotta protest and send messages. we cannot leave trans kids healthcare in the hands of those who seek to ban puberty blockers also fuck the former ni health minister too

  8. Cannot believe people actually believe giving puberty blockers to children is a good idea, fucking disgusting

  9. I never fail to wonder at how insane this debate is. I’d be willing to bet that the majority here have neither read the report or understand this debate.

    ALL the Cass report says is that gender care for children should be held up to an ordinary standard of evidence – which it falls well short of. That is what it says – in a well supported and measured way.

    GIDS was instituted over a decade ago, we should have lots of good outcome data for gender blockers. We don’t.

    And for those trying to use the BMA statement as evidence doctors oppose Cass, the BMA is a union. The (sole) committee that issued that statement has no gender care or endocrinological experience. Here’s a BMA editorial for you if you want another opposing opinion – https://www.bmj.com/content/385/bmj.q837

    Puberty blockers aren’t reversible. Sure, if you take them at 8 to stop precocious puberty and stop them at 12/13, you’ll (probably) be grand. But starting them at 12/13 and stopping them when you realise you’re not dysphoric after all at 16+ well… you’re out of luck. Your genitalia will not mature with you, your muscle mass and bone growth are f**ked and your future fertility is significantly in doubt.
    But hey, some keyboard warriors are just happy you had the chance to permanently damage yourself…

  10. Puberty blockers have been banned because they’re not safe or effective

Leave a Reply