if he continues to play in a team that can create for him, why not
Bro has a headstart, which he will definitely need considering these two went super Saiyan later in their careers.
He can if he stays mostly injury free. He has the advantage that he scores a bunch of goals from the start, Ronaldo took a few years before he scored at such a high rate consistently. Problem is he is still scoring at a high rate and is 38 or 39 years old, not many injuries either. Messi is still going too but probably won’t play quite as long. In the end though Haaland will never be considered as good as either of them. Ronaldo is a far better footballer than him and Messi is a far better footballer than Ronaldo.
Injuries will be his issue. He will do well to continue into his mid 30s considering that.
The big difference is that Haaland has always been a striker, whilst Messi played various positions, 10, wing or false 9, and Ronaldo played the wing at these ages
Not to take away Haaland’s brilliance, more to highlight the weak comparison.
He might catch, rather do much, much better in terms of goals but in other aspects of the game I doubt he’ll come near these two
If he actually buries his chances and City stay being City, probably
7 comments
if he continues to play in a team that can create for him, why not
Bro has a headstart, which he will definitely need considering these two went super Saiyan later in their careers.
He can if he stays mostly injury free. He has the advantage that he scores a bunch of goals from the start, Ronaldo took a few years before he scored at such a high rate consistently. Problem is he is still scoring at a high rate and is 38 or 39 years old, not many injuries either. Messi is still going too but probably won’t play quite as long. In the end though Haaland will never be considered as good as either of them. Ronaldo is a far better footballer than him and Messi is a far better footballer than Ronaldo.
Injuries will be his issue. He will do well to continue into his mid 30s considering that.
The big difference is that Haaland has always been a striker, whilst Messi played various positions, 10, wing or false 9, and Ronaldo played the wing at these ages
Not to take away Haaland’s brilliance, more to highlight the weak comparison.
He might catch, rather do much, much better in terms of goals but in other aspects of the game I doubt he’ll come near these two
If he actually buries his chances and City stay being City, probably