Am I missing something? Is it a call back to something? It just sounds weird lol
Least obvious media bias
Arseholes was maybe too offensive so they went with that.
they are American ergo – braveheart. Guess they must employ plenty brits or europeans though. It probably is intentional
At lest they don’t call you “regional separatists”
It’s just a site that hosts independent writers, iirc. They’ll all be from the same contributor I bet.
Not wrong tho
Trying to push a false narrative and kind of offensive stereotype of anyone supporting independence being a Groundskeeper Wullie type figure
‘Scexit charlatans’ would be a better term.
Or the ‘Scottish Nigels’
I quite like it tbf. A good cause fought by underdogs that were never supposed to be in power/
Why did this make me picture Nicola Sturgeon charging at the King with a claymore
Do they even bother to write about;
Unionist ‘ Surrender Monkeys’ ??
They think all Indy supporters are William Wallace
I do believe that the SNP only exist to make independence happen. Not sure what exactly is warrior like about them though.
Who doesn‘t know about the radical freedom fighters in the SNP. They‘re almost as scary as the Extreme Guevarists of the Labour Party.
It’s fighting talk, framing at it’s most infantile.
Edited cos my engurlish is pants, I blame the Freedomists
Politico is owned by Axel Springer SE, the CEOs of both Politico and Axel Springer are known US State Department assets. The bias is fairly obvious.
Partly media bias, and partly that is the only thing the party stands for really. Did the leadership elections not cement that in young snp voters. The second place is an extreme social conservative. The party cares about one thing, that’s independence. If they got independence the party would split.
It’s an accurate description? It both informs you what the SNP are about and highlights that they’re a bunch of clowns at the same time.
Perfect description.
Dog whistle for the rabid
Politico is trash, always has been, as soon as you realize that, you will not have any further questions.
As an indy supporter the only people using the phrase independence warriors are fucking daft cunts with brains smoother than a fucking snooker ball
It’s too suggest all indy supporters are violent and willing to wage war on those who aren’t. Divide and conquer. The brits answer to everything.
Sounds like something a Synth would say.
Sounds like they’re politically biased and thus not a reliable source of information
25 comments
Am I missing something? Is it a call back to something? It just sounds weird lol
Least obvious media bias
Arseholes was maybe too offensive so they went with that.
they are American ergo – braveheart. Guess they must employ plenty brits or europeans though. It probably is intentional
At lest they don’t call you “regional separatists”
It’s just a site that hosts independent writers, iirc. They’ll all be from the same contributor I bet.
Not wrong tho
Trying to push a false narrative and kind of offensive stereotype of anyone supporting independence being a Groundskeeper Wullie type figure
‘Scexit charlatans’ would be a better term.
Or the ‘Scottish Nigels’
I quite like it tbf. A good cause fought by underdogs that were never supposed to be in power/
Why did this make me picture Nicola Sturgeon charging at the King with a claymore
Do they even bother to write about;
Unionist ‘ Surrender Monkeys’ ??
They think all Indy supporters are William Wallace
I do believe that the SNP only exist to make independence happen. Not sure what exactly is warrior like about them though.
Who doesn‘t know about the radical freedom fighters in the SNP. They‘re almost as scary as the Extreme Guevarists of the Labour Party.
It’s fighting talk, framing at it’s most infantile.
Edited cos my engurlish is pants, I blame the Freedomists
Politico is owned by Axel Springer SE, the CEOs of both Politico and Axel Springer are known US State Department assets. The bias is fairly obvious.
Partly media bias, and partly that is the only thing the party stands for really. Did the leadership elections not cement that in young snp voters. The second place is an extreme social conservative. The party cares about one thing, that’s independence. If they got independence the party would split.
It’s an accurate description? It both informs you what the SNP are about and highlights that they’re a bunch of clowns at the same time.
Perfect description.
Dog whistle for the rabid
Politico is trash, always has been, as soon as you realize that, you will not have any further questions.
As an indy supporter the only people using the phrase independence warriors are fucking daft cunts with brains smoother than a fucking snooker ball
It’s too suggest all indy supporters are violent and willing to wage war on those who aren’t. Divide and conquer. The brits answer to everything.
Sounds like something a Synth would say.
Sounds like they’re politically biased and thus not a reliable source of information