Selenskyj sagt in Ramstein: Ukraine braucht Langstreckenwaffen und die Erlaubnis, Ziele tief im Inneren Russlands anzugreifen

Ukraine needs long-range weapons, permission to hit targets deep inside Russia, Zelenskyy says at Ramstein

13 comments

  2. And he’s right and the Western countries especially the USA must listen at what Zelensky says.

  3. The West is slow rolling it. Either through fear or due to not wanting a big escalation before the election.

    It’s shameful. We should be giving Ukraine all the support, and permission, to strike what they need to.

  5. Yeah, escalating things even more with a nuclear superpower seems like the smartest choice. I mean, what could possibly go wrong here?

    Surely if Ukraine gets all the support they need and bombs Russia to hell, Russia will eventually go like “OK Ukraine, you win. Take all the land back. Oh and go ahead and join NATO. We’d love to have them on our border”. This really seems like the most realistic scenario.

    Hope the west gives Zelensky all the support he needs. It will surely end well for Ukraine (and the world). The more Ukraine pushes Russia to the point of desperation, the less likely they are to push the red button, and the sooner we will have peace.

  7. I really admire how deftly Ukraine + the west are playing this in public. There’s been a slow but steady escalation in weapons and support; if the current level of supply and use in Ukrainian attacks on Russia had been leapt to a year ago it would have provoked a more dramatic response from Russia.

    And even now there’s a constant background of “it’s not enough, they’re holding us back”. Which is partly true, and partly careful messaging to support the story that NATO is being very careful not to get too involved.

    I’m sure there’s real frustration, and I’m sure more support would win the war faster, but this whole thing is kind of a reverse Vietnam and it is good to see the west playing this well.

  8. Getting more and more convinced that Russia cant be forced into a peace agreement or surrender and its going to have to be a knockout against them to end the war.

    Ironically also what Russia thought.

  11. Theoretically (not that I like this idea), holding on until right after nov6 isn’t a bad idea necessarily, it prevents the political fallout of what would happen if there is a major escalation, that gets attributed to our actions (fair or not). I’m really tired so I’m not filling in the blanks of this idea well, but hopefully it makes sense.

  12. when Moscow is being hit more frequently and strategic targets take out the things that Russia has been using to destroy Ukraine it will be enough force to make him come to the table. Putin doesn’t want to lose power or have any kind of major rift he won’t be able to quell within Russia. Once it starts having an impact on the oligarchs and those who are in the upper class they will put pressure on him.

  13. How is this war still happening? Did Russia way underestimate Ukraine or…? Shouldn’t Russia win within a few months?
    Are the countries that are helping Ukraine with weapons and such, just prolonging the inevitable?
    How will this end ? If ever?
    I’m curious.

Leave a Reply