Zelenskyy proposes preemptive strikes on North Korean troops in Russia: ‘It depends on our partners’

https://www.yahoo.com/news/zelenskyy-proposes-preemptive-strikes-north-173502465.html

38 comments

  2. Zelensky is pushing for pre-emptive strikes because he knows North Koreans won’t actually enter Ukraine – they might be deployed to Kursk and free up Russian soldiers to fight on the frontlines in Ukraine. North Korea and Russia can do this without North Korea risking further sanctions.

  4. i would tell Poland to accidentally fly some bomber over head and drop some bombs as a suggestion

  6. Is it weird that I’m actually for this? The NK war won’t be our issue.

  7. It’s weird how North Korea is involved but okkkkk let them be used as collateral damage.

  8. You mean, Zelensky proposes an attack on N. Korean troops.

    Stop calling attacks “pre-emptive strikes”. It’s an attack.

  9. We should fake their deaths and help them find new life’s somewhere else

  10. Allow it. Call Putin’s bluff while he is already struggling and desperate. From what I have seen, he doesn’t have the resources to retaliate.

  11. Is it just me, or does anyone else feel like Putin won’t use a Nuke in Ukraine , but if North Korea starts losing troops in Russia or Ukraine , he can scapegoat out the nuke use in Ukraine if it’s done by North Korea?

  12. “I have successfully privatized world peace”.

  13. NK may find out about drone warfare at home the hard way. Getting involved makes them a legitimate target.

  14. It’s a war? It’s a little frustrating how much permission Ukraine needs to do anything, while the Russians are playing to win.

    I think the West and its unwillingness to commit is a show of weakness.

  15. President Zelenskyy, you have my full permission to commence with preemptive strikes deep within Russia.

  17. Honestly, you could probably just fly over them at night and go straight to Moscow with a fleet of paramotors, troops, and high-quality thermal. That’s how bad their air defense is…

    The purpose of NK troops is to bait an escalation near the election and to delay further Ukrainian advances into Russian territory while Russia makes up for losing over half their military, whether it’s their tanks, planes, troops or even decades of artillery storage, it’s all been depleted through strategic strikes…

  18. Let the Ukrainians turn those NKs into some fine paste kimchi for their Ruzzian masters.

  20. I’ve got a feeling after this election is done we’re gonna let a few things off the chain. Either way. As a parting gift before dingus takes over again, or as a, we’ve got 4 more years let’s get this done.

  21. Not really preemptive if you’re actively at war. Go ahead.

  23. I can’t wait for someone to fire the ICBM’s so I can be done reading about this stuff.

  26. It’s easier to ask for forgivingness than permission. Just do it.

  27. absolute fucking joke he has to ask for permission. his allies should be as pissed off as he is.  

  28. Please, I hope they allow this. It’s insane not to at this point.

  29. According to the related news in South Korea, Kim will dispatch over 11,000 troopers first. Thus, Zelenskyy’s idea would be so effective. If the preemptive strike on North Korean soldiers might be valid, most of them will run away if they have a chance. Moreover, they would like to become AWOLs intentionally to survive, and if possible, they want to be POWs of the Ukrainian Army to stay alive. Because the defense ministry of South Korea got reliable HUMINT information such as many North Korean citizens didn’t agree with dispatch. Supposing those troopers would be meat shields on the battlefront, North Korea’s regime would be screwed up in the end by raging people.

  30. How would Ukraine distinguish between Russian soldiers and North Korean soldiers? Has Russia even acknowledged that there are North Korean soldiers on the front lines? And what is to prevent the Russian soldiers from wearing a North Korean flag on their uniform?

  31. Providing a path to surrender without penalty might be the cheapest solution.

  32. It’s a good way of finding out how they react to actual combat…

  35. As a representative of the UK government….make it rain honestly this is keir starmer if any one doubts you show them this as evidence

    Kier

  37. What happened to opsec, why is this information publicly available?

  38. That should have meant WW3. Now there’s another country teaming up on little Ukraine?!? Come on! Someone step in and show them where the kids table is…just not Canada. We’re already at the kids table.

Comments are closed.