Needs some description of what is being represented.
The election count isn’t finished. This map will be outdated in a few hours or days.
OC? Its everywhere in US rn?
Also no representation for any flipped states, no representation for any EV, candidates name, vote distribution, anything????
All this shows is Blue and Red, thats all there is nothing being represented here
This sub should be renamed Data that’s poorly conveyed
I know roughly where L.A and NY are
This is an ugly map. You should do a heatmap and every state should be red except WA.
Gained everywhere but Washington
So only Washington state became more blue?
Very awkward presentation. It’s not at all intuitive at all that -5.5 in CA and +0.5 in Washington state are the largest magnitude changes for and against Trump respectively.
The numbering system should always use the same axis across a dataset.
![US Presidential Election Swing to Winning Party [OC]](https://www.europesays.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/y11ft3pbh00e1-1920x1024.png)
11 comments
What is this? Beautiful how?
Hmmmm. Yes.
I understand what this means.
Needs some description of what is being represented.
The election count isn’t finished. This map will be outdated in a few hours or days.
OC? Its everywhere in US rn?
Also no representation for any flipped states, no representation for any EV, candidates name, vote distribution, anything????
All this shows is Blue and Red, thats all there is nothing being represented here
This sub should be renamed Data that’s poorly conveyed
I know roughly where L.A and NY are
This is an ugly map. You should do a heatmap and every state should be red except WA.
Gained everywhere but Washington
So only Washington state became more blue?
Very awkward presentation. It’s not at all intuitive at all that -5.5 in CA and +0.5 in Washington state are the largest magnitude changes for and against Trump respectively.
The numbering system should always use the same axis across a dataset.
Comments are closed.